Research Article
Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbial Composition and Meat Flavor of Two Chicken Breeds in Different Rearing Patterns
Table 3
The average percentage of tag numbers of each phylum in CR and FR chicken cecal microbiota (mean ± S.D.).
| Phyla | Caoke (C, %) | Partridge Shank (Q, %) | Free-Range | Cage-Range | Free-Range | Cage-Range | (FR) | (CR) | (FR) | (CR) |
| Actinobacteria | 6.09±2.53 | 1.84±1.16 | 2.00±0.22 | 1.92±0.15 | Bacteroidetes | 0.85±0.29 | 2.79± 2.27 | 19.05±2.19 | 9.88±1.41 | Firmicutes | 91.51±2.24 | 86.57±10.55 | 70.20±4.21 | 82.52±2.37 | Proteobacteria | 1.74±1.27 | 8.33±2.93 | 7.55±6.50 | 4.54±1.86 | Fusobacteria | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.39±0.25 | 0.00 |
|
|