Research Article
The Feasibility of 3D Printing Technology on the Treatment of Pilon Fracture and Its Effect on Doctor-Patient Communication
Table 2
Comparison of clinical data between the two groups.
| | Conventional group | 3D printing group | or | value |
| Operation time (min) | 90.2 ± 10.9 | 74.1 ± 8.2 | 8.021 | <0.001 | Blood loss volume (ml) | 159.8 ± 26.5 | 117.1 ± 20.7 | 8.625 | <0.001 | Times of fluoroscopy | 11.0 ± 2.9 | 7.6 ± 2.2 | 6.328 | <0.001 | Fracture union time (month) | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 5.0 ± 1.1 | 1.013 | 0.314 | Fracture reduction | — | — | 4.305 | 0.116 | Anatomic | 36 | 41 | 4.232 | 0.040 | Fair | 8 | 3 | 2.227 | 0.136 | Poor | 4 | 1 | 0.715 | 0.398 | Rate of anatomic reduction (%) | 75% | 91.1% | 4.232 | 0.040 |
|
|
value for continuity-corrected chi-squared test. |