Research Article

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Reduced Bone Mineral Density in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Risk factors for reduced bone mineral density in patients with SLE from the literature search.

Study (first author, year)CountryStudy designSizeFemale (%)Mean age (y)OutcomeRisk factorEstimate (aOR, 95% CI)

LAKSHMINARAYANAN et al. 2001USAProspective cohort9210032.8Low BMDMenopause3.32 (1.45, 7.62)
Yee et al. 2004UKCase control24295.539.9Low BMDNon-Afro-Caribbean
ever taken prednisolone >10 mg/day
2.5 (1.2, 5.4)
2.1 (1.1, 4.2)
LEE et al. 2007USACase control29810042.1Low hip BMDAfrican American race
Age at SLE diagnosis
BMI
Drink caffeine
SDI
SLE renal disease
Current use of GC
Study center
1.54 (0.69, 3.46)
0.98 (0.95, 1.01)
0.90 (0.84, 0.96)
1.33 (0.53, 3.36)
1.30 (1.08, 1.57)
0.79 (0.33, 1.87)
1.48 (0.71, 3.09)
0.95 (0.42, 2.15)
LEE et al. 2007USACase control29810042.1Low lumbar spine BMDAfrican American race
Age at SLE diagnosis
BMI/ kg/m2
Drink caffeine
SDI
SLE renal disease
Current use of GC
Study center
4.42 (2.19, 8.91)
0.96 (0.93, 0.99)
0.93 (0.89, 0.98)
0.34 (0.17, 0.72)
1.06 (0.89, 1.26)
1.50 (0.71, 3.16)
1.54 (0.81, 2.92)
0.71 (0.33, 1.53)
Furukawa et al. 2011JapanCase control5810044.0Low BMDNumber of deliveries
Maximal dosage of >50 mg/day of oral GC
5.58 (1.31, 26.06)
0.25 (0.07, 0.91)
Lim et al. 2011CanadaRetrospective cohort8082.514.2aLow BMDHigher BMI z score0.35 (0.18, 0.69)
Bonfá et al. 2015BrazilCase control36510032.8Low BMDCurrent GC use
Osteoprotegerin 245 T>G
3.97 (1.51, 10.41)
2.14 (1.02, 4.50)
Seguro et al. 2015BrazilProspective cohort6310031.1Low BMDNPT1
Cumulative GC
Mean GC
Maximum GC
1.03 (1.01–1.05)
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
1.0 (0.95, 1.04)
0.98 (0.95, 1.01)
Cramarossa et al. 2016CanadaProspective cohort28688.838.0Low BMDAge
Female
Cumulative ACR criteria
SDI excluding Osteoporosis
Vitamin D use
Calcium use
Bisphosphonates use
Immunosuppressives use
Cumulative GC dose
1.06 (1.04, 1.08)
0.47 (0.23, 1.00)
0.80 (0.63, 1.02)
1.43 (1.12, 1.82) 1.63 (0.94, 2.80) 1.63 (0.94, 2.80) 1.72 (0.85, 3.47) 1.51 (0.90, 2.52)
1.04 (1.01, 1.07)
Lacassagne et al. 2007CanadaProspective cohort6476.614.3OsteopeniaCumulative GC dose1.003 (1.001, 1.01)
Mak et al. 2011SingaporCase control1108740.5OsteopeniaDisease duration/month
BMI/kg/m2
Cyclosporine use
Cumulative GC dose
FMD/%
Carotid IMT/mm
1.031 (0.99, 1.073
0.78 (0.53, 1.16)
0.014 (0.00, 1.01)
1.080 (0.85, 1.38)
0.147 (0.02, 0.96)
0.000 (0.000)
SINIGAGLIA et al. 1999ItalyCase control8410030.5OsteoporosisDisease duration/year
Prednisone/year-use
1.2 (1.07, 1.33)
1.16 (1.05, 1.29)
Banno et al. 2002JapanCase control6010034.8OsteoporosisCumulative GC intake1.06 (1.01, 1.11)
Yee et al. 2004UKCase control24295.539.9OsteoporosisMenopause
Age/year
13.3 (1.6, 111.1)
1.0 (1.0, 1.1)
Lacassagne et al. 2007CanadaProspective cohort6476.614.3OsteoporosisDisease duration/year
lupus nephritis
1.60 (1.18, 2.18)
8.79 (0.96, 80.24)
Crosslin et al. 2011USACase control1482990.547.3OsteoporosisMale0.65 (0.43, 0.97)
Ajeganova et al. 2015SwedenCase control2228948.7OsteoporosisCarotid plaque1.78 (0.97, 3.24)

Note: OR, odds ratio; USA, United States of America; BMD, bone mineral density; UK, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; BMI, Body mass index; SLICC/ACR-DI, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology-Damage Index; GC, glucocorticoid; NPT1, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen; FMD, flow-mediated dilatation. Hint: ; aRR: adjusted risk ratio.