Research Article

Chemokine Receptor CXCR3 Correlates with Decreased M2 Macrophage Infiltration and Favorable Prognosis in Gastric Cancer

Table 3

Correlation analysis of the expression of CXCR3 with M2 macrophage infiltration and the clinicopathologic parameters.

High-CXCR3 expressionLow-CXCR3 expressionP value
(n = 59)(n = 97)

CD1630.001
 High22 (37.29%)62 (63.92%)
 Low37 (62.71%)35 (36.08%)
Gender0.483
 Male45 (76.27%)69 (71.13%)
 Female14 (23.73%)28 (28.87%)
Age0.303
 < 5833 (55.93%)46 (47.42%)
 ≧5826 (44.07%)51 (52.58%)
Diameter (cm)0.248
 < 533 (55.93%)45 (46.39%)
 ≧526 (44.07%)52 (53.61%)
Ki670.173
 <10%9 (15.25%)8 (8.25%)
 ≧10%50 (84.75%)89 (91.75%)
Lymph node metastasis0.143
 No19 (32.20%)21 (21.65%)
 Yes40 (67.80%)76 (78.35%)
Differentiation0.017
 Well-moderately21 (35.59%)18 (18.56%)
 Poorly38 (64.41%)79 (81.44%)
Invasion depth0.003
 T1/T215 (65.22%)8 (34.78%)
 T3/T444 (33.08%)89 (66.92%)
TNM stage0.02
 I+II23 (38.98%)21 (21.65%)
 III+IV36 (61.02%)76 (78.35%)
Lauren’s classification0.716
 Intestinal25 (42.37%)44 (45.36%)
 Diffuse34 (57.63%)53 (54.64%)

T1, tumor invades lamina propria, muscularis mucosae, or submucosa; T2, tumor invasion of the muscularis propria; T3, tumor invasion subserosal connective tissue; T4, tumor invasion serosal or adjacent structures.