Research Article

The Relationship between Knee Adduction Moment and Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms according to Static Alignment and Pelvic Drop

Table 4

Linear relationships between KAM-related measures (independent variable) and VAS pain (dependent variable) according to radiographic disease severity and pelvic drop angle (PDA) in the varus group.

VAS painUnivariable analysisMultivariable analysisMultivariable analysis
Correlation coefficientRegression coefficientSlope valueCorrelation coefficientRegression coefficientSlope valueCorrelation coefficientRegression coefficientSlope value

Peak KAM (Nm/(BW × HT)%)
 KL grade 2 (n = 14)−0.102−0.1090.811−0.681−0.7290.104−0.769−0.823≤0.001
 KL grade 3 (n = 26)0.0190.0150.8940.1600.1250.1530.1830.1440.109
 KL grade 4 (n = 37)0.1750.1110.0910.1790.1130.0820.1630.1030.116
 PDA ≤ 3 (n = 45)0.3460.3260.0010.2840.2680.0010.2620.2470.002
 PDA > 3 (n = 32)0.1750.1440.1670.1270.1040.2050.1510.1250.126
KAM impulse (Nm·s/(BW × HT)%)
 KL grade 2 (n = 14)0.1580.2500.709−0.813−1.2840.160−0.878−1.645≤0.001
 KL grade 3 (n = 26)0.0960.1190.5000.1440.1800.1890.1330.1660.248
 KL grade 4 (n = 37)0.1720.1130.0980.1690.1110.1020.1320.0870.274
 PDA ≤ 3 (n = 45)0.3880.475≤0.0010.2750.3360.0010.2550.3120.009
 PDA > 3 (n = 32)0.3470.2800.0050.1900.1530.0660.1390.1120.207

KL: Kellgren and Lawrence; PDA: pelvic drop angle; KAM: knee adduction moment; BW: body weight; HT: height; VAS: visual analog scale. Age; age, speed.