Research Article

Looking for Lepidic Component inside Invasive Adenocarcinomas Appearing as CT Solid Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (SPNs): CT Morpho-Densitometric Features and 18-FDG PET Findings

Table 2

Imaging parameters and significant statistical tests. The table shows the main results of imaging analysis expressed as the mean value and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and as percentage for categorical variables. For statistical tests, a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

ParametersMean ± SDCorrelation

Maximum diameter (Dmax)15.45 ± 2.58Dmax / SUVmax: R = 0.501
CE53.34 ± 31.49SUVmax/Lobulated: R = 0.455
SUVmax2.21 ± 2.15

Morphologic parametersHypothesisp-value

Spiculated margins (SpM)40.91Spicules (40.91%) vs. SmM (9.09%)0.0195 (M)
Lobulated margins (LM)27.27SpM (40.91%) vs. SmM (9.09%)0.0327 (M)
Irregular margins (IM)27.27Notch (45.45%) vs. SmM (9.09%)0.0107 (M)
Smooth margins (SmM)9.09CE (90.91%) vs. SUVmax (31.82%)4.9⋅10−4 (M)
Notch45.45CE (90.91%) vs. SpM (40.91%)1.7⋅10−3 (M)
Spicules40.91CE (90.91%) vs. LM (27.27%)2.6⋅10−4 (M)
Positive CE (≥ 15 HU)CE (90.91%) vs. IM (27.27%)6.0⋅10−5 (M)
CE +90.91CE (90.91%) vs. SmM (9.09%)4.0⋅10−6 (M)
Positive SUVmax (≥ 2.5)CE (90.91%) vs. Notch (45.45%)9.8⋅10−4 (M)
SUVmax +31.82CE (90.91%) vs. Spicules (40.91%)1.7⋅10−3 (M)

Parameters Mean ± SD Hypothesisp-value

Dmax (SUV ≥ 2.5)18.86 ± 5.62Dmax (SUV ≥ 2.5) vs. Dmax (SUV < 2.5)0.0384 (T)
Dmax (SUV < 2.5)14.27 ± 4.88

T: T-Student test; R: Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient; M: McNemar’s exact test.