Review Article

Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors between Older and Younger Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

(a) Analysis of age-specific pooled hazard ratios and 95%CI of overall survival for younger patients assigned to intervention treatment, compared with those assigned to control treatment, by subgroup

AnalysisNRandom-effects modelFixed-effects modelHeterogeneity
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PI2P

Class of immune checkpoint inhibitor120.75 (0.65, 0.87)≤0.0010.80 (0.75, 0.86)≤0.00175.1%≤0.001
PD-1/PD-L1100.71 (0.60, 0.84)≤0.0010.76 (0.70, 0.82)≤0.00172.2%≤0.001
CTLA-420.95 (0.73, 1.25)0.7180.97 (0.84, 1.13)0.73167.7%0.079

Type of immune checkpoint inhibitor100.75 (0.63, 0.90)0.0010.81 (0.75, 0.87)≤0.00178.4%≤0.001
Nivolumab30.79 (0.53, 1.18)0.2490.82 (0.69, 0.98)0.02879.2%0.008
Pembrolizumab30.54 (0.42, 0.68)≤0.0010.55 (0.46, 0.66)≤0.00142.0%0.178
Atezolizumab20.85 (0.75, 0.95)0.0050.85 (0.75, 0.95)0.0050.0%0.641
Ipilimumab20.95 (0.73, 1.25)0.7180.97 (0.84, 1.13)0.73167.7%0.079

Pathology120.75 (0.65, 0.87)≤0.0010.80 (0.75, 0.86)≤0.00175.1%≤0.001
Small cell lung cancer21.04 (0.88, 1.23)0.6131.04 (0.88, 1.23)0.6130.0%0.441
Non-small cell lung cancer100.71 (0.60, 0.83)≤0.0010.76 (0.70, 0.82)≤0.00171.6%≤0.001

Histotype50.62 (0.47, 0.81)≤0.0010.66 (0.58, 0.76)≤0.00172.1%0.006
Squamous30.63 (0.45, 0.88)0.0060.68 (0.56, 0.81)≤0.00164.9%0.058
Non-squamous20.60 (0.32, 1.11)0.1020.64 (0.52, 0.79)≤0.00188.2%0.004

Line120.75 (0.65, 0.87)≤0.0010.80 (0.75, 0.86)≤0.00175.1%≤0.001
First-line50.89 (0.71, 1.12)0.3290.94 (0.84, 1.06)0.33266.8%0.017
Subsequent line70.67 (0.56, 0.81)≤0.0010.74 (0.68, 0.80)≤0.00172.0%0.002

Masking120.75 (0.65, 0.87)≤0.0010.80 (0.75, 0.86)≤0.00175.1%≤0.001
Double-blind60.71 (0.53, 0.95)0.0220.80 (0.71, 0.90)≤0.00183.0%≤0.001
Open-label60.78 (0.66, 0.93)0.0050.80 (0.73, 0.87)≤0.00165.8%0.012

(b) Analysis of age-specific pooled hazard ratios and 95%CI of overall survival for older patients assigned to intervention treatment, compared with those assigned to control treatment, by subgroup

AnalysisNRandom-effects modelFixed-effects modelHeterogeneity
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PI2P

Class of immune checkpoint inhibitor120.81 (0.72, 0.92)0.0010.82 (0.76, 0.90)≤0.00148.8%0.015
PD-1/PD-L1100.76 (0.67, 0.87)≤0.0010.76 (0.69, 0.84)≤0.00137.1%0.094
CTLA-421.02 (0.86, 1.21)0.7831.02 (0.87, 1.21)0.7770.7%0.388

Type of immune checkpoint inhibitor100.80 (0.69, 0.93)0.0030.82 (0.74, 0.89)≤0.00153.4%0.009
Nivolumab30.83 (0.59, 1.18)0.3040.82 (0.67, 0.99)0.04260.9%0.037
Pembrolizumab30.72 (0.59, 0.88)0.0010.72 (0.59, 0.88)0.0010.0%0.782
Atezolizumab20.66 (0.47, 0.91)0.0130.70 (0.58, 0.83)≤0.00160.2%0.113
Ipilimumab21.02 (0.86, 1.21)0.7831.02 (0.87, 1.21)0.7770.7%0.388

Pathology120.81 (0.72, 0.92)0.0010.82 (0.76, 0.90)≤0.00158.8%0.015
Small cell lung cancer20.76 (0.45, 1.29)0.3130.86 (0.70, 1.05)0.13281.8%0.004
Non-small cell lung cancer100.82 (0.72, 0.92)0.0010.82 (0.74, 0.90)≤0.00133.9%0.111

Histotype50.79 (0.64, 0.98)0.0300.80 (0.69, 0.93)0.00347.2%0.066
Squamous30.87 (0.65, 1.17)0.3470.89 (0.74, 1.07)0.20753.9%0.070
Non-squamous20.66 (0.52, 0.84)0.0010.66 (0.52, 0.84)0.0010.0%0.678

Line120.81 (0.72, 0.92)0.0010.82 (0.76, 0.90)≤0.00148.8%0.015
First-line50.87 (0.71, 1.07)0.1930.92 (0.81, 1.04)0.18259.0%0.023
Subsequent line70.76 (0.66, 0.86)≤0.0010.76 (0.68, 0.85)≤0.00119.0%0.274

Masking120.81 (0.72, 0.92)0.0010.82 (0.76, 0.90)≤0.00148.8%0.015
Double-blind60.80 (0.66, 0.98)0.0290.84 (0.75, 0.95)0.00757.9%0.020
Open-label60.81 (0.69, 0.97)0.0180.80 (0.72, 0.90)≤0.00143.4%0.089

NoteFoot. The p value for heterogeneity is from the I2 test comparing the interaction HRs across subgroups including class of ICI, type of ICI, pathology, histotype, line of treatment, masking method, and represents heterogeneity within each subgroup. PD-1/PD-L1= programmed cell death-1/ programmed cell death-Ligand 1. CTLA4=cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4.