Research Article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and MRI in the Mapping of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) Consensus

Table 3

Cross tabulation of study results.

CompartmentAreas investigated for DEIndex testsTP (%)FP (%)TN (%)FN (%)Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)LR+ (95% CI)LR− (95% CI)Accuracy (95% CI)p-value

Anterior compartmentBladderTVS8 (16.3%)0 (0.0%)40 (81.6%)1 (2%)0.89 (0.52–1.00)1.00 (0.91–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.98 (0.86–1.00)Infinity0.11 (0.02–0.71)0.98 (0.89–1.00)0.25
MRI9 (18.3%)2 (4.1%)38 (77.6%)0 (0.0%)1.00 (0.66–1.00)0.95 (0.83–0.99)0.82 (0.54–0.95)1.00 (1.00–1.00)20 (5.1–77.2)0.000.96 (0.86–0.99)
Ureteric obstruction by DETVS/TAS5 (10.2%)0 (0.0%)44 (89.8%)0 (0.0%)1.00 (0.48–1.0)1.00 (0.92–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)Infinity0.001.00 (0.93–1.00)1.000
MRI5 (10.2%)0 (0.0%)44 (89.8%)0 (0.0%)1.00 (0.48–1.0)1.00 (0.92–1.0)1.00 (1.00–1.00)100 (1.00–1.00)Infinity0.001.00 (0.93–1.00)

Posterior compartmentUSL§TVS25 (51%)5 (10.2%)10 (20.4%)9 (18.3%)0.74 (0.56–0.87)0.67 (0.38–0.88)0.83 (0.70–0.91)0.53 (0.36–0.68)2.21 (1.05–4.64)0.40 (0.20–0.77)0.71 (0.57–0.83)0.039
MRI32 (65.3%)6 (12.2%)9 (18.3%)2 (4.1%)0.94 (0.80–0.99)0.60 (0.32–0.84)0.84 (0.74–0.91)0.82 (0.52–0.95)2.35 (1.26–4.40)0.10 (0.02–0.40)0.84 (0.70–0.93)
Right USLTVS10 (20.4%)5 (10.2%)26 (53%)8 (16.3%)0.56 (0.31–0.78)0.84 (0.66–0.95)0.67 (0.45–0.83)0.76 (0.65–0.85)3.44 (1.40–8.50)0.53 (0.31–0.91)0.73 (0.59–0.85)0.001
MRI17 (34.7%)11 (22.4%)20 (40.8%)1 (2%)0.94 (0.73–1.00)0.65 (0.45–0.81)0.61 (0.49–0.72)0.95 (0.75–0.99)2.66 (1.63–4.33)0.09 (0.01–0.59)0.76 (0.61–0.87)
Left USLTVS21 (42.9%)0 (0.0%)23 (46.9%)5 (10.2%)0.81 (0.61–0.93)1.00 (0.85–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.82 (0.68–0.91)0.000.19 (0.09–0.42)0.90 (0.78–0.97)0.220
MRI23 (46.9%)2 (4.1%)21 (42.9%)3 (6.1%)0.88 (0.70–0.98)0.91 (0.72–0.99)0.92 (0.75–0.98)0.88 (0.71–0.95)10.17 (2.69–38.52)0.13 (0.04–0.37)0.90 (0.78–0.97)
Upper rectumTVS10 (20.4%)0 (0.0%)39 (79.6%)0 (0.0%)1.00 (0.69–1.00)1.00 (0.91–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)Infinity0.001.00 (0.93–1.00)1.000
MRI10 (20.4%)0 (0.0%)39 (79.6%)0 (0.0%)1.00 (0.66–0.89)1.00 (0.91–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)Infinity0.001.00 (0.93–1.00)
RectosigmoidTVS16 (32.7%)5 (10.2%)27 (55.1%)1 (2%)0.94 (0.71–1.00)0.84 (0.67–0.95)0.76 (0.59–0.88)0.96 (0.80–0.99)6.20 (2.67–13.59)0.07 (0.01–0.47)0.88 (0.75–0.95)1.000
MRI16 (32.7%)5 (10.2%)27 (55.1%)1 (2%)0.94 (0.71–1.00)0.84 (0.67–0.95)0.76 (0.59–0.88)0.96 (0.80–0.99)6.20 (2.67–13.59)0.07 (0.01–0.47)0.88 (0.75–0.95)
RVSTVS4 (8.2%)0 (0.0%)43 (87.8%)2 (4.1%)0.67 (0.22–0.96)1.00 (0.92–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.96 (0.87–0.98)Infinity0.33 (0.11–1.03)0.96 (0.86–1.00)0.125
MRI5 (10.2%)3 (6.1%)40 (81.6%)1 (2%)0.83 (0.36–1.00)0.93 (0.81–0.99)0.63 (0.35–0.84)0.98 (0.87–1.00)11.9 (3.79–37.67)0.18 (0.03–1.07)0.92 (0.80–0.98)
VaginaTVS6 (12.2%)0 (0.0%)38 (77.6%)5 (10.2%)0.55 (0.23–0.83)1.00 (0.91–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.88 (0.80 –0.94)Infinity0.45 (0.24–0.87)0.90 (0.78–0.97)0.688
MRI8 (16.3%)2 (4.1%)36 (73.5%)3 (6.1%)0.73 (0.39–0.94)0.95 (0.82–0.99)0.80 (0.50–0.94)92.31 (0.82–0.97)13.82 (3.42–55.9)0.29 (0.11–0.76)0.90 (0.78–0.97)
POD obliterationTVS35 (71.5%)1 (2%)8 (16.3%)5 (10.2%)0.88 (0.73–0.96)0.89 (0.52–1.00)0.97 (0.85–1.00)0.62 (0.41–0.79)7.87 (1.24–50.16)0.14 (0.06–0.33)0.88 (0.75–0.95)0.040
MRI23 (46.9%)5 (10.2%)4 (8.2%)17 (34.7%)0.58 (0.41–0.73)0.44 (0.14–0.79)0.82 (0.71–0.90)0.19 (0.09–0.35)1.03 (0.54–1.97)0.96 (0.42–2.16)0.55 (0.40–0.69)

PelvisOverall pelvic DETVS80 (20.4%)10 (2.5%)280 (71.4%)22 (5.6%)0.78 (0.69–0.86)0.97 (0.94–0.98)0.89 (0.81–0.94)0.93 (0.90–0.95)22.8 (12.30–42.20)0.22 (0.15–0.32)0.92 (0.89–0.94)
MRI93 (23.7%)25 (6.4%)265 (67.6%)9 (2.3%)0.91 (0.84–0.96)0.91 (0.88–0.94)0.79 (0.72–0.84)0.97 (0.94–0.98)10.58 (7.24–15.46)0.10 (0.05–0.18)0.91 (0.88–0.94)

§At least one affected side correctly identified. Total DE lesions are the sum of all individual sites affected in all participants. CI, confidence intervals; DE, deep endometriosis; FN, false negative; FP, False positive; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NPV, negative predictive value; -value, probability value of ultrasound vs. MRI performance (<0.05 considered significant); POD, pouch of Douglas; PPV, positive predictive value; RVS, rectovaginal septum; USL, uterosacral ligament; TAS, transabdominal ultrasound scan; TN, true negative TP, true positive; TVS, transvaginal ultrasound scan.