Predictions of Apoptosis Proteins by Integrating Different Features Based on Improving Pseudo-Position-Specific Scoring Matrix

Table 3

Performance comparison of original data and sampling methods for each class of sample.

Dataset location	Original dataset			Resampling 1			Resampling 2
	Mcc	F-m	G-mean	Mcc	F-m	G-mean	Mcc	F-m	G-mean
ZD98
Cy	91.83	93.94	96.1	95.17	97.56	97.57	97.3	100	97.7
Me	100	100	100	98.35	100	98.83	100	100	100
Mi	90.24	100	91.29	96.44	96.43	99.09	98.2	98.2	99.3
Others	95.2	97.59	97.59	98.33	100	98.8	100	100	100
CL317
Cy	86.43	91.26	93.7	96.56	96.56	99.63	97.31	97.28	99.71
Me	94.95	98.7	96.58	98.86	99.43	99.43	100	100	100
Mi	92.51	94.62	97.22	99.14	99.41	99.9	98.83	98.83	99.79
Se	89.91	96.44	93.6	97.78	99.44	98.54	96.13	100	96.85
Nu	82.62	91.48	90.76	95.2	96.98	97.98	99.37	99.37	99.9
En	86.87	100	87.45	96.23	99.4	97.28	99.41	99.41	99.89
ZW225
Cy	79.44	88.62	89.98	91.65	92.79	97.61	94.7	94.64	99.11
Me	89.75	94.37	93.85	97.85	97.85	99.53	98.9	98.9	99.76
Mi	78.83	92.03	86.52	97.4	99.13	98.54	99.15	100	99.42
Nu	76.62	86.35	88.81	94.69	100	96.18	96.47	100	97.5