Review Article

The Efficacy of Teriparatide in Improving Fracture Healing in Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Summary of the included studies.

Study IDDesignDiagnosisNo. of patientsAgePrimary treatmentMedical treatmentOutcome measuresFollow-up
TeriparatideControlTeriparatideControlTeriparatideControl

Bhandari 2016RCTFemoral neck fracture788170 (50–94)70 (50–90)ORIF20 μg, once daily for 6 monthsPlacebo, identical deviceReoperation, fracture healing, pain, complications, adverse events, death, and deformity12 months
Chesser 2016RCTTrochanteric fracture1514ORIF20 μg, once daily for 6 weeksStandard controlDeath, complications, and fracture healing3 months
Huang 2015Retrospective studyPertrochanteric fractures3150ORIF20 μg, once daily for 18 monthsWithout receiving teriparatideDeath, reoperation, pain, complications, fracture healing, subsequent fracture, and HHS40.1 months
Huang 2016Retrospective studyIntertrochanteric fractures4783ORIF20 μg, once daily for 18 monthsWithout receiving teriparatideFracture healing, complications, death, reoperation, and subsequent fracture12 months
Kim 2018Retrospective studyIntertrochanteric fractures465081.6 (65.8-97.9)82.3 (67.1-99.3)ORIF56.5 μg, weekly for 8 weeksWithout receiving teriparatideHHS, pain, fracture healing, complications, reoperation, and deformity6 months
Kim 2019Retrospective studyIntertrochanteric fractures526081.4 (66.2-97.9)80.2 (67.1-99.3)ORIF20 μg, once daily for 2 monthsWithout receiving teriparatideHHS, pain, fracture healing, complications, reoperation, and deformity19 months