Pedicle Morphometry Variations in Individuals with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Table 4

Pedicle diameters in the current study compared with only radiologic studies.

Study	Mean diameters (mm)	L1	L2	L3	L4	L5
Current study ()	PW	7	7.3	8.8	10.7	15.2
	PH	14.9	14.1	14	13	11.7
Mohanty et al., 2018 (-124)	PW	7.2	7.6	8.4	10.1	13
Acharya et al., 2010 ()	PW	7.20	7.62	8.97	11.12	13.91
Chadha et al., 2003 (-20)	PW	6.69	7.26	8.43	10.81	13.47
Kadioglu et al., 2003 ()	PW	8.8	9.7	10.3	10.8	14.6
	PH	14.7	14.5	13.6	13.6	13.4
Mitra et al., 2002 ()	PW	7.34	7.45	8.51	9.71	14.49
	PH	16.42	15.65	15.24	15.29	15.17
Cheung et al., 1994 (-134)	PW	5.3	6.7	9.5	11.5	14.7
Bernard and Seibert, 1992 ()	PW	ND	8.13	8.7	10.88	14.54
Olsewski et al., 1990 (-42)	PW	8.2	8.3	10	12.6	16.6
	PH	18.2	17.2	16.9	15.6	13.8
Marchesi et al., 1988 (-46)	PW	7.1	7.8	9.7	13	18
	PH	15.4	14.8	14.2	13.9	13.7
Zindrick et al., 1987 (-56)	PW	8.7	8.9	10.3	12.9	18
	PH	15.4	15	14.9	14.8	14
Krag et al., 1986 (-24)	PW	7.01	8.67	9.30	11.03	15.15

ND: no data; PW: pedicle width; PH: pedicle height.