BioMed Research International / 2020 / Article / Tab 1 / Review Article
Which Is the Most Appropriate PI3K Inhibitor for Breast Cancer Patients with or without PIK3CA Status Mutant? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Table 1 Baseline characteristic of included RCTs.
Intervention PI3K inhibitors type Control type Study (year) Sample size Receptor type Population Alpelisib Fulvestrant Rugo et al., 2020 [19 ] I(T): 284; C(T): 287 HR-positive, HER2-negative Postmenopausal women André et al., 2019 [20 ] I(M): 169; C(M): 172; I(W): 115; C(W): 116 HR-positive, HER2-negative Men and postmenopausal women Buparlisib Fulvestrant Di Leo et al., 2018 [22 ] I(T): 289; C(T): 143 HR-positive, HER2-negative Postmenopausal women Baselga et al.,2017 [23 ] I(T): 576; C(T): 571 HR-positive, HER2-negative Postmenopausal women Trastuzumab+paclitaxel Loibl et al., 2017 [24 ] I(T): 25; C(T): 25 HER2-positive Premenopausal and postmenopausal women Paclitaxel Martín et al., 2016 [26 ] I(T): 207; C(T): 209 HER2-negative Premenopausal and postmenopausal women Taselisib Fulvestrant Saura et al., 2019 [21 ] I(M): 73; C(M): 79; I(W): 92; C(W): 89 ER-positive, HER2-negative Postmenopausal women Pictilisib Fulvestrant Krop et al., ,2016 [25 ] I(T): 89; C(T): 79 ER-positive Postmenopausal women Paclitaxel Vuylsteke et al., 2016 [27 ] I(T): 91; C(T): 92 HR-positive, HER2-negative Premenopausal and postmenopausal women
I: intervention group; C: control group; M: PIK3CA mutated, W: PIK3CA wild-type; T: PIK3CA mutated and wild-type.