AEBP1 Is One of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Regulatory Genes in Colon Adenocarcinoma

Li, Dandan; Liu, Zhi; Ding, Xiaorong; Qin, Zhensheng

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3108933

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 3108933 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3108933

AEBP1 Is One of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Regulatory Genes in Colon Adenocarcinoma

Dandan Li,¹Zhi Liu,¹Xiaorong Ding,²and Zhensheng Qin¹

Academic Editor: Anna Chiarini

Received16 Aug 2021

Revised27 Oct 2021

Accepted22 Nov 2021

Published12 Dec 2021

Abstract

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is involved in various tumor processes, including tumorigenesis, tumor cell migration and metastasis, tumor stemness, and therapeutic resistance. Therefore, it is important to identify the genes most associated with EMT and develop them as therapeutic targets. In this work, we first analyzed EMT hallmark gene expression profiles among 10,535 pan-cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and divided them into EMT high and EMT low groups according to the metagene scores. Then, we identified 12 genes that were most associated with high EMT metagene score () in 329 colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) patients. Among them, only 4 genes (AEBP1, KCNE4, GFPT2, and FAM26E) had statistically significant differences in prognosis (). Next, we selected AEBP1 as a candidate and showed that AEBP1 mRNA levels and EMT biomarkers strongly coexpressed in 329 COAD samples. In addition, AEBP1 was highly expressed and associated with poor clinical outcomes and prognosis in COAD patients. Finally, to explore whether AEBP1-mediated EMT was related to the tumor microenvironment (TME), we examined AEBP1 expression levels at the single-cell levels. Our results showed that AEBP1 levels were extremely high in tumor-associated fibroblasts, which may induce EMT. AEBP1 expression was also positively correlated with the expression of fibroblast biomarkers and also with EMT metascores, suggesting that AEBP1-mediated EMT may be associated with the stimulation of fibroblast activation. Therefore, AEBP1 may be a promising target for EMT inhibition, which reduces cancer metastasis and drug resistance in COAD patients.

1. Introduction

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is characterized by late onset, rapid tumor progression, and heterotopic metastasis, and it is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world [1]. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the choices of treatment for resectable and advanced COAD [2, 3]. Despite the application of targeted drugs and immunosuppressive agents that extend the survival of patients, there is still a need to overcome metastasis and treatment resistance in COAD.

EMT is a cellular process by which cells lose their epithelial characteristics and gain mesenchymal properties [4]. EMT has been involved in a variety of tumor characteristics, including tumorigenesis, malignant progression, tumor cell migration and metastasis, blood intravasation, tumor stemness, and therapeutic resistance [4–6]. The evidence is overwhelming, on the other hand, that cancer progression and metastasis initiate in cells with the majority of stem cell characteristics, termed cancer stem cells (CSCs) [7]. CSCs are known to be able to self-renew and divide asymmetrically. These cells contribute to tumorigenesis, expansion, resistance, metastasis, and recurrence after treatment [8]. The differences between CSCs and non-CSCs may mainly attribute to the cell biological events involved in EMT [9, 10]. Increased evidence suggests a strong association between EMT and the production of CSCs [11].

EMT involves a variety of signaling pathways that alter the expression of genes by regulating major transcription factors such as Snail, Twist, and ZEB, which increase the expression of mesenchymal cell markers and decrease epithelial cell markers, ultimately transforming the epithelial cell phenotype into mesenchymal stem cells [12, 13]. Snails represent a ZINC finger transcription factor family with participation in different molecular mechanisms. This family includes three members, known as Snail1 (Snail), Snail2 (Slug), and Snail3 (Smuc) [14, 15]. Among them, the most important member is Snail1, which holds essential roles in the induction of migration and metastasis of cancer cells by EMT. Twist, the second effective transcription factor in EMT, consists of two members, namely, Twist-1 (Twist) and Twist-2 (Dermo-1) [16]. In previous studies regarding Twist-1, it was reported to play key functions in cancer metastasis, angiogenesis, and stem cells. However, little information is available on the molecular basis of Twist-2 [17]. Lastly, the zinc finger E-box binding homology box (ZEB) is known as the third major transcription factor of EMT and consists of two members, ZEB1 and ZEB2 [18]. It has been shown that ZEB1 and ZEB2 contribute to the metastatic properties of cancer cells by binding to the E-box sequence of the E-cadherin promoter and suppressing the expression of E-cadherin [18].

Adipocyte enhancer binding protein 1 (AEBP1) was initially considered a transcriptional suppressor of the adipose P2 (aP2) gene in preadipocytes [19]. With a high expression in macrophages, AEBP1 has been demonstrated to stimulate the production of multiple inflammatory mediators, including interleukin 6 (IL-6), monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), and tumor necrosis factor ɑ (TNF-ɑ) [20]. Recent studies have demonstrated that AEBP1 may play vital roles in promoting carcinogenesis. AEBP1 has been implicated in the development and progression of a variety of tumors, including gastric cancer [21], colon cancer [22], and glioblastoma [23].

It is very crucial to find the genes most associated with EMT and to incorporate them into cancer therapeutic strategies for the reduction of cancer metastasis and drug resistance. In this study, we identified one gene most relevant to EMT hyperactivation and explored the roles of its expression on clinical outcomes and prognosis in COAD patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw gene count expression profiles for pan-cancer and COAD samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (http://tcga.xenahubs.net). After filtering low-expressing genes and samples of poor RNA quality, gene counts of 10,535 patients were normalized using TPM (transcripts per million reads) methods and corrected for overdispersion. EMT scores were calculated across all patients though 200 genes using the gene set downloaded from MSigDB (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb). We calculated a metagene 0 score as low EMT expression and >1 score as high EMT expression. We also calculated in total 329 COAD samples from the TCGA database to find the most correlating gene () based on the EMT metagene score.

2.2. Correlation Analysis

AEBP1 expression, the levels of EMT-related genes (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, ZEB2, CDH1, CDH2, VIM, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, KRT8, and TJP1), and the expression of fibroblasts biomarkers (ACTA2, PALLD, PDPN, P4HA3, MMP11, and FAP) were obtained from 329 COAD samples in the TCGA dataset. Pearson correlation coefficient tests were used to estimate the relationship between AEBP1 expression and other genes.

2.3. AEBP1 mRNA Expression in COAD Samples

We used UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu) resource to explore AEBP1 expression levels in normal and tumors in COAD patients generated from TCGA database [24]. We also investigated the expression of AEBP1 based on individual cancer stages and nodal metastasis status. Pathologic nodal metastasis was descripted as follows: N0, no regional lymph node metastasis; N1, metastases in 1 to 3 axillary lymph nodes; N2, metastases in 4 to 9 axillary lymph nodes; and N3, metastases in 10 or more axillary lymph nodes.

2.4. AEBP1 Protein Expression in COAD Samples

We used Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) Confirmatory/Discovery dataset to check AEBP1 protein levels [25]. In the CPTAC database, the protein expression for colon cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma is available. In this study, we explored AEBP1 protein expression in tumor and normal tissues in COAD samples and the relationship between AEBP1 levels and TNM stages.

2.5. Single-Cell Analysis

Tumor Immune Single-Cell Hub (TISCH) (http://tisch.comp-genomics.org/) is used to investigate AEBP1 expression in tumor microenvironment at single-cell resolution. TISCH is a scRNA-seq database focusing on tumor microenvironment (TME). TISCH provides detailed cell type annotations at the single-cell levels, enabling the exploration of TME across different cancer types [26]. In this dataset, there are mainly three cell types, including immune cells, stromal cells, and malignant cells. Immune cells include B cells, conventional CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, exhausted CD8 T cells, dendritic cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, plasma cells, mast cells, monocytes or macrophages, natural killer cells, neutrophils, proliferating T cells, and regulatory T cells. Stromal cells consist of endothelial, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and other cells.

3. Results

3.1. The most Relevant Gene Candidates for EMT in COAD Were Identified

To identify the genes most associated with EMT, we first analyzed EMT hallmark gene expression profiles among 10,535 clinical pan-cancer samples from TCGA database. We calculated metagene scores (0 - >1, low to high EMT) through 200 genes using hallmark gene sets (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb). Heatmap showed the expression pattern from the 200 EMT genes based on EMT metagene scores; then, the groups were divided into EMT high and EMT low groups according to the metagene scores (Figure 1(a)). These 200 genes were all highly expressed in the EMT high score group, indicating that the EMT high score could provide a good representation of the EMT pathway being activated (Figure 1(a)). Next, we discovered the genes associated with EMT based on EMT metagene scores and listed 12 most correlating genes with EMT () in 329 patients with COAD (Figure 1(b)). We further used Cox proportional-hazards radio to filter the prognostic-related genes. Among these 12 genes, only 4 genes (AEBP1, KCNE4, GFPT2, and FAM26E) had statistical differences () (Figure 1(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1

The most relevant gene candidates for EMT in COAD were identified. (a) EMT hallmark gene expression profiles among 10,535 clinical pan-cancer samples from TCGA database were calculated by meta-gene scores (0 - >1, low to high EMT) though 200 genes using hallmark gene sets (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb). The heatmap showed the 200 EMT gene expression pattern based on EMT metagene scores, and the groups were divided into EMT high and EMT low groups according to the metagene scores. (b) The heatmap showed 12 genes that were most associated with high EMT metagene score () in 329 COAD patients. (c) The values of the 12 genes were calculated, and only 4 genes (AEBP1, KCNE4, GFPT2, and FAM26E) had statistical differences (). .

3.2. AEBP1 Is Highly Associated with EMT in COAD Patients

We next selected AEBP1 as the candidate of its regulation of EMT and its roles in COAD. Since primary analyses suggested that the EMT gene set was significantly enriched in the high levels of the AEBP1 group, we therefore explore whether AEBP1 expression levels have linked to EMT biomarkers. To better understand the correlation between the AEBP1 expression and the levels of EMT-activated genes, we investigated both AEBP1- and EMT-related genes (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, ZEB2, CDH1, CDH2, VIM, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, KRT8, and TJP1) levels in EMT activation status (Figure 2(a)). Our data showed that high mRNA levels of AEBP1 were positively associated with EMT metagene scores, which presented the similar trend as the EMT-related gene expression, indicating that there might be a positive correlation between AEBP1 mRNA levels and the expression of EMT-activated genes (Figure 2(a)). To confirm our hypothesis, we explored the coexpression of AEBP1 and EMT biomarkers. The results showed that the mRNA levels of AEBP1 and EMT biomarkers greatly correlated in 329 COAD samples in the TCGA database (Figure 2(b)). These results confirmed that AEBP1 is strongly correlated with EMT in COAD patients.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2

AEBP1 is highly associated with EMT in COAD patients. (a) Heatmap analysis showed AEBP1 expression and the levels of EMT biomarkers (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, ZEB2, CDH1, CDH2, VIM, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, KRT8, and TJP1) in 329 COAD patients. The high mRNA levels of AEBP1 were positively associated with EMT metagene scores and the expression of EMT-related genes. (b) Correlation between AEBP1 expression and the levels of EMT biomarkers (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, ZEB2, CDH1, CDH2, VIM, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, KRT8, and TJP1) in 329 COAD patients.

3.3. AEBP1 Is Highly Expressed and Associated with Poor Clinical Outcomes in COAD Patients

To explore the effects of AEBP1 on clinical patients, we first investigated the expression levels of AEBP1 among normal and tumor samples in cancer patients in the TCGA database. The result showed that the mRNA expression of AEBP1 was significantly upregulated in almost all clinical cancer tissues compared to normal tissues, including COAD (Supplement Figure 1 and Figure 3(a)). Similarly, we also investigated the AEBP1 protein levels in the CPTAC dataset and showed the overexpression of AEBP1 in COAD samples (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 3

AEBP1 is highly expressed and associated with poor clinical outcomes in COAD patients. (a) The mRNA expression of AEBP1 in 41 normal tissues and 286 COAD tumors from TCGA dataset generated by UALCAN. (b) The protein levels of AEBP1 in 100 normal tissues and 97 tumors from CPTAC database generated by UALCAN. (c) The mRNA expression of AEBP1 in different TNM stages from TCGA dataset. (d) AEBP1 protein levels in different TNM stages from CPTAC database. (e) The mRNA expression of AEBP1 in different lymph node metastasis status from TCGA database. , , , and .

To better understand the relationship between AEBP1 expression and clinical features, we assessed AEBP1 levels in different TNM stages and nodal metastasis status, in which higher TNM stages and more nodal metastasis exhibit faster tumor progression and greater metastatic ability. We observed that there were higher mRNA expression levels of AEBP1 in all stages (stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage IV) of tumor samples than in normal samples (Figure 3(c)). Moreover, a higher TNM stage (stage III) showed stronger AEBP1 expression than a lower stage (stage I) of tumor samples (Figure 3(c)), suggesting that AEBP1 mRNA expression levels were correlated with TNM stages of COAD patients. Similarly, AEBP1 protein levels were significantly related to TNM stage in COAD patients (Figure 3(d)). In addition, the increased AEBP1 expression was obviously correlated with more metastatic lymph nodes (Figure 3(e)). Taken together, AEBP1 is significantly upregulated and related to poor clinical features in COAD patients.

3.4. AEBP1 Is Correlated with Poor Clinical Prognosis in COAD Patients

We next investigated the relationship between AEBP1 levels and the survival of patients with COAD. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that the high expression of AEBP1 was related to short overall survival (OS) in 329 COAD patients () (165 samples with low AEBP1 expression and 164 samples with high AEBP1 expression) in the TCGA database (Figure 4). These results suggested that higher expression of AEBP1 was associated with worse prognosis in patients with COAD.

3.5. AEBP1 Is Mainly Expressed in Fibroblasts

We have demonstrated that AEBP1 was greatly associated with the EMT signaling pathway, AEBP1 was highly expressed, and that high expression of AEBP1 was correlated with poor patient pathological characteristics and prognosis in COAD patients. However, we still do not know how AEBP1 regulates EMT.

The TME consists of extracellular matrix (ECM), tumor-associated fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, immune cells, and soluble factors associated with tumor development and metastasis [27]. In the TME, EMT can be induced among tumor cells by autocrine or paracrine secretion of some mediators such as growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix proteins [28, 29]. In cancer cells, tumor-associated fibroblasts are able to induce EMT in tumor cells [30]. Therefore, to further explore whether AEBP1-mediated EMT was associated with the TME, we examined in the TISCH database, a single-cell hub, in which cell populations AEBP1 was mainly expressed. Firstly, the levels of AEBP1 were analyzed of single-cell subpopulations across all tumors, including immune cells, tumor cells, and stromal cells. Interestingly, AEBP1 was expressed in malignant cells and stromal cells, especially predominantly in stromal cells, which was consistent in almost all tumors, as well as in COAD samples (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). The tumor-associated stromal cells mainly include endothelial, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts. We next examined which stromal cell component was the AEBP1 high-expressing cells in COAD. The results showed that fibroblasts were the major expressing cells (Figure 5(c)). We further explored one of the COAD GSE dataset (GSC_GSE146771_Smartseq2) (Figure 5(d)); AEBP1 levels were extremely highly expressed in fibroblasts (Figures 5(e) and 5(f)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

Figure 5

AEBP1 is mainly expressed in fibroblasts. (a) Heatmap analysis showed average expression of AEBP1 in different cell types across the TISCH dataset in all cancers. (b, c) Heatmap analysis showed average expression of AEBP1 in different cell-types across TISCH dataset in COAD. (d–f) The distribution of AEBP1 in different cell types was analyzed in the GSE146771_Smartseq2 dataset. (g, h) The distribution of AEBP1 and EMT biomarkers (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, and ZEB2) in different cell types was analyzed in the GSE146771_Smartseq2 dataset.

Next, we explored the expression of AEBP1 and EMT biomarkers (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, and ZEB2) in different immune cells. AEBP1 and SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, and ZEB2 showed similar expression levels in cell types (Supplement Figure 2). Both of AEBP1- and EMT-related genes were predominantly expressed in stromal cells and, in particular, mainly in fibroblasts (Figures 5(g) and 5(h)).

3.6. AEBP1 Expression Is Highly Related to Biomarkers of Tumor-Associated Fibroblasts

We have found that AEBP1 expression was highly expressed in fibroblasts. We further investigated whether AEBP1 expression was linked to tumor-associated fibroblasts biomarkers.

Several molecular markers have been used to identify continuously activated fibroblasts, for example, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) [31] and cytoskeletal protein (palladin) [32]. Recently, several new molecular markers have been reported, including mucin-type protein (podoplanin), matrix metalloproteinase (stromelysin-3), collagen prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4H), and fibroblast activation protein (FAP), which are associated with the activation of fibroblasts [33]. We then verified our suspicions to check the coexpression of AEBP1 and fibroblast biomarkers, including ACTA2 (α-SMA), PALLD (palladin), PDPN (podoplanin), P4HA3, MMP11 (stromelysin-3), and FAP in 329 COAD samples in the TCGA dataset. Interestingly, AEBP1 expression was positively correlated with the expression of fibroblast biomarkers and also with EMT metascores (Figure 6(a)). AEBP1 was extremely coexpressed with fibroblast biomarkers ACTA2 (, ), PALLD (, ), MMP11 (, ), P4HA3 (, ), FAP (, ), and PDPN (, ) (Figure 6(b)). These results suggested that AEBP1-mediated EMT may be associated with promoting fibroblast activation.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

A high incidence and mortality has been shown in patients with colon cancer [1]. Tumor invasion and metastasis are the underlying causes of treatment failure and lack of efficacy in colon cancer patients [34]. In the development of tumor malignancy, EMT is known to lead to a loss of interadhesion between tumor cells, resulting in an enhanced ability to invasion and migration [35]. Therefore, to improve the clinical prognosis of patients with colon cancer, it is critical to find effective and safe blockers of EMT activation to inhibit tumor progression in colon cancer.

We identified the most relevant genes for EMT activation of 329 clinical samples with COAD from the TCGA database. They are AEBP1, KCNE4, GFPT2, FPT2, and FAM26E. AEBP1 is an important transcriptional repressor involved in the regulation of key biological processes, including inflammation, mammogenesis, and adipogenesis [36]. Increasing studies have shown that AEBP1 is a potential oncogene for different types of cancers. It is aberrantly expressed in various malignancies, including glioblastoma, bladder cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, and skin cancer [36–38]. Here, we demonstrated that similar results were found with the overexpression of AEBP1 in clinical COAD samples and highly correlated with poor pathological features. In addition to aberrant expression in tumor tissues, AEBP1 also exhibited poor prognostic survival in COAD. Therefore, targeting AEBP1, one of the genes most associated with EMT activation in COAD, may be an effective agent for EMT inhibition.

Currently, several reports suggest that AEBP1 regulates tumor progression through the following mechanisms. AEBP1 plays a role in tumorigenesis via activation of the NF-κB pathway in cancer cells [21, 22]. AEBP1 restrains childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) through a p53-dependent pathway [39]. AEBP1 is able to act on glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) mediated by PI3K/AKT signaling, which is involved in the initiation and maintenance of tumor cells [40]. In this study, we have greatly demonstrated the correlation between AEBP1 and EMT activation. However, whether and how AEBP1 regulates EMT is still unknown. To address this shortcoming, we will confirm the regulatory association between AEBP1 and EMT in vivo and in vitro experiments in the future to better understand their cancer-promoting mechanisms.

Two factors can induce EMT in tumor cells, including growth factors and the TME. Early studies found that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) promotes EMT in tumor cells by altering the expression of E-cadherin on the surface of tumor cells [41]. It was found in later studies that transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and epithelial growth factor (EGF) can also bind to the corresponding membrane receptors and activate their downstream signaling pathways, thus inducing EMT in tumor cells [42]. In the TME, EMT can be induced among tumor cells by the secretion of some mediators such as growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix proteins [28, 29]. In cancer cells, tumor-associated fibroblasts could trigger EMT in cancer cells, and the TME could initiate and maintain EMT [43]. Here, we showed that AEBP1 levels were highly expressed in tumor-associated fibroblasts, which may induce EMT. Moreover, AEBP1 expression was positively correlated with the expression of fibroblast biomarkers and also with EMT metascores, suggesting that AEBP1-mediated EMT may be associated with the facilitation of fibroblast activation.

There remain several questions to the current work. First, several other genes most associated with EMT (KCNE4, GFPT2, and FAM26E) (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)) may also regulate EMT activation. We will further explore whether they are also aberrantly expressed in COAD and if their expression levels also have effects on the survival of COAD patients. In addition, our finding suggested that AEBP1 was mainly expressed in tumor-associated fibroblasts and positively associated with fibroblast activation. However, it is unknown whether AEBP1 expression in fibroblasts is exclusively correlated with EMT activation, and what the exact mechanism of how AEBP1 mediates EMT could be. We will follow up with more experiments to further validate our suspicions in the future.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Innovative Young Talent of The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (No. 2018Q14).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Supplement Figure 1: AEBP1 is highly expressed in patients with many cancer types. AEBP1 expression in tumors and normal tissues in many cancer types from TCGA dataset generated by UALCAN.

Supplementary 2. Supplement Figure 2: both of AEBP1 and EMT-related genes were predominantly expressed in fibroblasts. The distribution of AEBP1 and EMT biomarkers (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1, ZEB1, and ZEB2) in different cell types was analyzed in the GSE146771_Smartseq2 dataset.

References

H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel et al., “Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Cedermark, M. Dahlberg, B. Glimelius, L. Påhlman, L. E. Rutqvist, and N. Wilking, “Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, no. 14, pp. 980–987, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ektate, M. C. Munteanu, H. Ashar, J. Malayer, and A. Ranjan, “Chemo-immunotherapy of colon cancer with focused ultrasound and Salmonella-laden temperature sensitive liposomes (thermobots),” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Nieto, R. Y. J. Huang, R. A. Jackson, and J. P. Thiery, “EMT: 2016,” Cell, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 21–45, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Brabletz, “To differentiate or not -- routes towards metastasis,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 425–436, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. De Craene and G. J. N. R. C. Berx, “Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Nassar and C. Blanpain, “Cancer stem cells: basic concepts and therapeutic implications,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47–76, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Harris and B. A. Kerr, “Prostate cancer stem cell markers drive progression, therapeutic resistance, and bone metastasis,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2017, Article ID 8629234, 9 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Polyak and R. A. Weinberg, “Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 265–273, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Medema, “Cancer stem cells: the challenges ahead,” Nature cell biology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 338–344, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Shibue and R. A. Weinberg, “EMT, CSCs, and drug resistance: the mechanistic link and clinical implications,” Nature reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 611–629, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lamouille, J. Xu, and R. Derynck, “Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition,” Nature reviews Molecular cell biology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 178–196, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Babaei, S. G. G. Aziz, and N. Z. Z. Jaghi, “EMT, cancer stem cells and autophagy; the three main axes of metastasis,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 133, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, J. Shi, K. Chai, X. Ying, and B. Zhou, “The role of snail in EMT and tumorigenesis,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 963–972, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ganesan, E. Mallets, and J. Gomez-Cambronero, “The transcription factors Slug (SNAI2) and Snail (SNAI1) regulate phospholipase D (PLD) promoter in opposite ways towards cancer cell invasion,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 663–676, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Puisieux, S. Valsesia-Wittmann, and S. Ansieau, “A twist for survival and cancer progression,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, M. A. Rahman, Z. G. Chen, and D. M. Shin, “Multiple biological functions of Twist1 in various cancers,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 20380–20393, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ang, L. Zheng, J. Wang et al., “Expression of and correlation between BCL6 and ZEB family members in patients with breast cancer,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 3985–3992, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-S. Ro, S.-W. Kim, D. Wu, C. Webber, and T. E. J. G. Nicholson, “Gene structure and expression of the mouse adipocyte enhancer-binding protein,” Gene, vol. 280, no. 1-2, pp. 123–133, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Majdalawieh, L. Zhang, I. V. Fuki, D. J. Rader, and H. S. Ro, “Adipocyte enhancer-binding protein 1 is a potential novel atherogenic factor involved in macrophage cholesterol homeostasis and inflammation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 2346–2351, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Liu, L. Jiang, J. J. Liu et al., “AEBP1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition of gastric cancer cells by activating the NF-κB pathway and predicts poor outcome of the patients,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 11955, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xing, Z. Zhang, F. Chi et al., “AEBP1, a prognostic indicator, promotes colon adenocarcinoma cell growth and metastasis through the NF‐κB pathway,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1795–1808, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Cheng, X. Shao, Q. Wang, X. Jiang, Y. Dai, and S. Chen, “Adipocyte enhancer binding protein 1 (AEBP1) knockdown suppresses human glioma cell proliferation, invasion and induces early apoptosis,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 216, no. 2, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Chandrashekar, B. Bashel, S. Balasubramanya et al., “UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses,” Neoplasia, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 649–658, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Chen, D. S. Chandrashekar, S. Varambally, and C. J. Creighton, “Pan-cancer molecular subtypes revealed by mass-spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of more than 500 human cancers,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sun, J. Wang, Y. Han et al., “TISCH: a comprehensive web resource enabling interactive single-cell transcriptome visualization of tumor microenvironment,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 49, no. D1, pp. D1420–D1430, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-Y. Jung, L. Fattet, and J. Yang, “Molecular pathways: linking tumor microenvironment to epithelial–mesenchymal transition in metastasis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 962–968, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. W. Chung and J. B. Lim, “Role of the tumor microenvironment in the pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 1667, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Leibovich-Rivkin, Y. Liubomirski, B. Bernstein, T. Meshel, and A. Ben-Baruch, “Inflammatory factors of the tumor microenvironment induce plasticity in nontransformed breast epithelial cells: EMT, invasion, and collapse of normally organized breast textures,” Neoplasia, vol. 15, no. 12, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Lebret, D. F. Newgreen, E. W. Thompson, and M. L. J. B. C. R. Ackland, “Induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in PMC42-LA human breast carcinoma cells by carcinoma-associated fibroblast secreted factors,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ronnov-Jessen, O. W. Petersen, and M. J. Bissell, “Cellular changes involved in conversion of normal to malignant breast: importance of the stromal reaction,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 69–125, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Rönty, S.-K. Leivonen, B. Hinz et al., “Isoform-Specific Regulation of the Actin-Organizing Protein Palladin during TGF-β1-Induced Myofibroblast Differentiation,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 126, no. 11, pp. 2387–2396, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ramirez-Montagut, N. E. Blachere, E. V. Sviderskaya et al., “FAPα, a surface peptidase expressed during wound healing, is a tumor suppressor,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 32, pp. 5435–5446, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Vences-Catalán and S. Levy, “Immune Targeting of Tetraspanins Involved in Cell Invasion and Metastasis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Aiello, R. Maddipati, R. J. Norgard et al., “EMT Subtype Influences Epithelial Plasticity and Mode of Cell Migration,” Developmental Cell, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 681–695.e4, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Majdalawieh, M. Massri, and H. S. Ro, “AEBP1 is a novel oncogene: mechanisms of action and signaling pathways,” vol. 2020, Article ID 8097872, 20 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D.-J. Cheon, Y. Tong, M.-S. Sim et al., “A Collagen-Remodeling Gene Signature Regulated by TGF-β Signaling Is Associated with Metastasis and Poor Survival in Serous Ovarian Cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 711–723, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ladha, S. Sinha, V. Bhat, S. Donakonda, and S. M. J. M. C. R. Rao, “Identification of Genomic Targets of Transcription Factor Aebp1 and its role in Survival of Glioma Cells,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1039–1051, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, C. X. Juan, A. M. Feng et al., “Attenuating the abnormally high expression of AEBP1 suppresses the pathogenesis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia via p 53-dependent signaling pathway,” European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1184–1195, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Hou, B. Sun, W. Liu et al., “Targeting of glioma stem-like cells with a parthenolide derivative ACT001 through inhibition of AEBP1/PI3K/AKT signaling,” Theranostics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 555–566, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xiong et al., “Epidermal growth factor promotes transforming growth factor-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in HK-2 cells through a synergistic effect on Snail,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 241–250, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Vergara, B. Merlot, J.-P. Lucot et al., “Epithelial–mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer,” Cancer Letters, vol. 291, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Matsuoka, M. Yashiro, Y. Doi et al., “Hypoxia Stimulates the EMT of Gastric Cancer Cells through Autocrine TGFβ Signaling,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 5, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Dandan Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

431

Downloads

1157

Citations