Research Article
Rehardening of Eroded Enamel with CPP-ACFP Paste and CO2 Laser Treatment
Table 1
Comparison of mean difference microhardness (kg/mm2) values of studied groups.
| | Groups | | 95% confidence interval for mean | Minimum | Maximum | value | | Lower bound | Upper bound |
| | (G1) Negative control | A | 306.6 | 321.3 | 294 | 337 | 0.0001 | | (G2) Positive control | B | 206.2 | 221.2 | 195 | 236 | | (G3) CO2 laser | C | 254.1 | 278.5 | 235 | 306 | | (G4) CPP-ACFP | C | 257.2 | 284.2 | 241 | 318 | | (G5) Laser+CPP-ACFP | C | 271.0 | 301.5 | 251 | 331 | | (G6) CPP-ACFP+laser | A | 295.4 | 319.6 | 269 | 339 |
|
|
One way-ANOVA; same capital letters show no difference by using POH Tukey HSD tests ( ). |
