Three-Dimensional Outcome Assessments of Surgical Correction in Cleft and Noncleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relation: A Case-Control Study

Table 2

Comparison of the PSMs of all samples (ANOVA).

	Groups			Scheffe
Outcome discrepancy	Non-CLP (45)	BCLP (17)	UCLP (33)	value	N^@-B^#	N-U^%	B-U
Translational (mm)
A-X				0.032	-0.51	-0.69	-0.19
A-Y				0.001	-1.69	-1.05	0.64
A-Z				0.436	-0.11	0.30	0.41
MxR-X				0.037	-0.55	0.55	0.006
MxR-Y				0.009	-1.29	-1.71	-0.42
MxR-Z				0.156	0.83	0.68	-0.15
MxL-X				0.061	-0.49	-0.48	0.00
MxL-Y				0.001	-2.02	-1.12	0.90
MxL-Z				0.005	1.61	0.83	-0.77
Angular (°)
Roll				0.106	-1.37	-0.80	0.57
Pitch				0.006	-0.09	1.96	2.04
Yaw				0.002	-0.46	-1.84	-1.38

The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level; ^@Non-CLP patients; ^#patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate; ^%patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.