Research Article

TCF7L1 Genetic Variants Are Associated with the Susceptibility to Cervical Cancer in a Chinese Population

Table 5

The association of TCF7L1 SNPs with the risk of cervical cancer stratified by age.

SNPModelAllele/genotypeCaseControlOR (95% CI)CaseControlOR (95% CI)

Age> 51≤ 51
rs11904127AlleleG32726813172961
A1852060.74 (0.57-0.95)0.0191832020.85 (0.66-1.09)0.199
CodominantGG108761101811
GA1111160.67 (0.46-0.99)0.0491151340.69 (0.47-1.01)0.056
AA37450.58 (0.34-0.98)0.04034340.80 (0.46-1.40)0.435
DominantGG108761101811
AG-AA1481610.65 (0.45-0.94)0.0211491680.71 (0.49-1.03)0.068
RecessiveGG-AG21919212162151
AA37450.72 (0.45-1.16)0.17334340.99 (0.60-1.66)0.982
Log-additive0.74 (0.58-0.96)0.0210.84 (0.64-1.09)0.186
rs2366264AlleleG36531713513601
T1471590.80 (0.61-1.05)0.1111511501.03 (0.79-1.35)0.816
CodominantGG12910811201251
GT1071010.89 (0.61-1.29)0.5311111101.05 (0.73-1.51)0.793
TT20290.58 (0.31-1.08)0.08320201.05 (0.54-2.04)0.898
DominantGG12910811201251
TG-TT1271300.82 (0.57-1.17)0.2651311301.05 (0.74-1.49)0.787
RecessiveGG-TG23620912312351
TT20290.61 (0.33-1.11)0.10420201.02 (0.53-1.95)0.950
Log-additive0.80 (0.61-1.05)0.1131.03 (0.79-1.36)0.810
rs11689667AlleleT36631513533591
C1461610.78 (0.60-1.02)0.0721471510.99 (0.76-1.30)0.942
CodominantTT13010611231241
TC1061030.84 (0.58-1.22)0.3601071110.97 (0.67-1.40)0.873
CC20290.56 (0.30-1.05)0.06920201.01 (0.52-1.97)0.975
DominantTT13010612302351
TC-CC1261320.78 (0.55-1.11)0.1651231240.98 (0.69-1.39)0.895
RecessiveTT-TC23620911271311
CC20290.61 (0.33-1.11)0.10320201.03 (0.54-1.96)0.941
Log-additive0.78 (0.60-1.02)0.0730.99 (0.75-1.30)0.942
rs62162674AlleleG36230313493511
C1501750.72 (0.55-0.94)0.0141511610.94 (0.72-1.23)0.668
CodominantGG1269411191161
GC1101150.72 (0.49-1.04)0.0811111190.91 (0.63-1.31)0.600
CC20300.50 (0.27-0.93)0.02820210.93 (0.48-1.81)0.839
DominantGG1269411191161
CG-CC1301450.67 (0.47-0.96)0.0281311400.91 (0.64-1.29)0.602
RecessiveGG-CG23620912302351
CC20300.59 (0.32-1.07)0.08020210.98 (0.52-1.86)0.947
Log-additive0.71 (0.54-0.93)0.0140.94 (0.71-1.24)0.659

values were calculated by logistic regression adjusted by age. indicates statistical significance.