Research Article
Effectiveness of Hospital-Based Systemic Rehabilitation in Improving Ankle Function after Surgery in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients
Table 3
Comparison of the ankle strength of the affected side and spatiotemporal gait metrics between the two groups after the intervention.
| | Intervention group () | Control group () | valuea | | T0 | T1b | T2b | T0 | T1b | T2b |
| | Ankle motor strength (nm) | | Invertor | | | | | | | | | Evertor | | | | | | | | | Dorsiflexor | | | | | | | | | Plantar flexor | | | | | | | | | Gait analysis | | Velocity (km/h) | | | | | | | | | Cadence (steps/min) | | | | | | | | | Step length, affected (cm) | | | | | | | | | Step length, unaffected (cm) | | | | | | | | | Stride length (cm) | | | | | | | | | Stance phase, affected (%) | | | | | | | | | Stance phase, unaffected (%) | | | | | | | | | Swing phase, affected (%) | | | | | | | | | Swing phase, unaffected (%) | | | | | | | | | Double stance phase (%) | | | | | | | |
|
|