Review Article

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of Circular RNA circ-ITCH Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis

Table 1

Characteristics of included studies in this meta-analysis.

First author (ref.)YearCancerCountrySample sizeDetection methodsCutoff valueClinicopathological featuresHR (95% CI)Data sourceFollow-up time (months)NOS score

Hao et al. [28]2020Oral squamous cell carcinomaChina103qRT-PCRMedian①②OS (U), 2.08 (1.26-3.46)CurveUp to 608
Lin et al. [24]2020Ovarian cancerChina45qRT-PCRMedian①②③OS (U), 2.36 (1.11-5.02)CurveUp to 608
Zhou et al. [32]2020Multiple myelomaChina92qRT-PCRMedianNAOS (U), 2.70 (1.15-6.25)DirectMedian 24.57
Li et al. [27]2019Lung cancerChina190qRT-PCRMedian①②③OS (U), 2.27 (1.39-3.57)CurveUp to 368
Liang et al. [23]2019Ovarian cancerChina122qRT-PCRNANAOS (U), 2.86 (1.43-5.88) OS (M), 4.74 (1.40-16.13)DirectMedian 306
Wang et al.a [19]2019Prostate cancerChina52qRT-PCRMedianOS (U), 3.85 (1.92-8.33)CurveUp to 708
Huang et al. [20]2019Prostate cancerChina364qRT-PCRMedianOS (U), 2.50 (1.49-4.17) OS (M), 2.41 (1.42-4.08)DirectUp to 608
Ghasemi et al. [29]2019Gastric cancerIran30qRT-PCRMedian①②③NANANA7
Wang et al.b [26]2019Breast cancerChina91qRT-PCRMedian①②③OS (U), 2.44 (1.30-4.55)CurveUp to 1008
Luo et al. [22]2018Ovarian cancerChina77qRT-PCRMedianNAOS (U), 4.76 (1.52-14.29) OS (M), 4.07 (1.16-14.29)DirectMedian 287
Hu et al. [21]2018Ovarian cancerChina20qRT-PCRNANAOS (U), 2.27 (1.09-4.76)CurveUp to 1406
Li et al. [31]2018GliomaChina60qRT-PCR0.36NAOS (U), 3.33 (1.14-4.55) OS (M), 2.33 (1.20-5.43)DirectUp to 807
Yang et al. [25]2018Bladder cancerChina70qRT-PCRNA②③OS (U), 1.89 (1.05-3.33)Curve1-607
Guo et al. [30]2017Hepatocellular carcinomaChina288qRT-PCRMedianNAOS (U), 2.22 (1.47-3.45)DirectUp to 907

NA: not available; qRT-PCR: quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; ①: lymph node metastasis (LNM); ②: TNM stage; ③: tumor size; OS: overall survival; U: univariate analysis; M: multivariate analysis; curve: Kaplan-Meier curve; the cutoff value of this study is 0.36 which was established by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.