Comparison of the Efficacy of the Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging Methods in the Surgical Planning of the Maxillary All-On-4, M-4, and V-4
Table 1
Comparison results by gender.
Gender
Total
Test statistics
Female
Male
Between nasal floors
11,9 ± 2,3
12,4 ± 2,3
12,2 ± 2,3
0.085
12,1(4,1-16,1)
12,3 (5,8-18,0)
12,3 (4,1-18,0)
Nose edge—maxillary sinus (right)
5,5 ± 1,7
6,0 ± 2,1
5,8 ± 2,0
0.045
5,4 (1,8-9,0)
5,8 (2,7-11,8)
5,5 (1,8-11,8)
Nose edge—maxillary sinus (left)
5,3 ± 1,6
6,1 ± 1,8
5,8 ± 1,7
0.003
5,2 (2,3-9,4)
6,0 (2,3–11,0)
5,5 (2,3-11,0)
Lateral incisor region—first molar region (left)
19,1 ± 3,6
20,1 ± 4,3
19,7 ± 4,1
0.091
18,2(11,2-271)
20,2 (8,3-28,0)
19,5 (8,3-28,0)
Lateral incisor region—first molar region (right)
19,0 ± 3,3
19,7 ± 4,3
19,4 ± 3,9
0.196
19,1(9,6-27,5)
19,7 (5,3-28,9)
19,4 (5,3-28,9)
Lateral incisor region (left)—lateral incisor region (right)
16,7 ± 2,9
17,7 ± 3,1
17,3 ± 3,0
0.030
16,9(8,9-22,9)
17,7(11,1-26,1)
17,5 (8,9-26,1)
Nasal floor—alveolar crest (right)
12,9 ± 3,8
13,8 ± 3,4
13,4 ± 3,6
0.086
12,8(5,1-21,2)
13,8 (5,8-24,7)
13,3 (5,1-24,7)
Nasal floor—alveolar crest (left)
12,9 ± 3,8
14,1 ± 3,6
13,6 ± 3,7
0.021
12,8(5,3-22,0)
13,7 (5,4-25,4)
13,3 (5,3-25,4)
Note: : independent -test for two samples. Data are presented as /median (minimum-maximum) in millimeter. indicates a significant difference.
