Research Article
[Retracted] Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy with Postoperative Double-Channel Digestive Tract Reconstruction: A Case-Control Analysis
Table 1
Baseline comparison between the two groups.
| | TG-RY () | PG-DT () | |
| Gender | | | 0.069 | Male [ (%)] | 16 (72.7%) | 8 (44.4%) | | Female [ (%)] | 6 (27.3%) | 10 (55.6%) | | Age (year) | | | 0.895 | BMI (kg/m2) | | | 0.413 | Diameter of tumor (cm) | | | 0.742 | Differentiated degree [ (%)] | | | 0.550 | Poorly differentiated | 15 (68.2%) | 12 (66.7%) | | Moderately differentiated | 7 (31.8%) | 6 (33.3%) | | High differentiation | 0 | 1(5.6%) | | Pathological pattern | | | 0.499 | Adenocarcinoma | 20 (90.9%) | 16 (88.9%) | | Signet-ring cell carcinoma | 2 (9.0%) | 1 (5.6%) | | Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 0 | 1 (5.6%) | | Tumor TNM staging [ (%)] | | | 0.026 | I | 5 (22.7%) | 0 | | II | 7 (31.8%) | 3 (16.7%) | | III | 10 (45.5%) | 15 (83.3%) | | Tumor location | | | 0.256 | Gastric body | 10 (45.45%) | 5 (27.8%) | | Fundus of stomach | 3 (13.6%) | 1 (5.6%) | | Cardia | 9 (40.9%) | 12 (66.7%) | |
|
|