Research Article
Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
Table 4
Comparison of those who gave birth within 12 hours and who did not.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
aOne-way ANOVA (robust statistic: Brown-Forsythe). kKruskal-Wallis test (Monte Carlo); post hoc test: Dunn’s test. ffFisher-Freeman-Halton (Monte Carlo). ePearson chi-square test (Monte Carlo); post hoc test: Benjamini-Hochberg correction. UMann–Whitney test (Monte Carlo). WWilcoxon signed rank test (Monte Carlo); quantitative variables are shown as or median (min-max); categorical data were shown as (%). ASignificance according to the multiple-dose group. BSignificance according to the single-dose group. CSignificance according to the spontaneous birth group. Pregnant women who did not deliver in 12 hours. Pregnant women who delivered in 12 hours. |