Research Article
Upregulation of Centromere Proteins as Potential Biomarkers for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis and Prognosis
Table 1
Univariate Cox regression analysis of ESCC patients’ overall survival in TCGA.
| Characteristics | Total (%) | HR (95% CI) | |
| Sex | Female vs. male | 15 (15.8%) vs. 80 (84.2%) | 0.175 (0.041-0.756) | 0.020 | Race | White+other vs. Asian Missing | 47 (49.5%) vs. 45 (47.4%) 3 (3.2%) | 1.570 (0.688-3.581) | 0.284 | Age | ≥60 vs. <60 | 39 (41.1%) vs. 56 (58.9%) | 1.296 (0.631-2.662) | 0.461 | T stage | T3+T4 vs. T1+T2 Missing | 54 (56.8%) vs. 40 (42.1%) 1 (1.1%) | 1.351 (0.649-2.811) | 0.422 | N stage | N2+N3 vs. N0+N1 Missing | 9 (9.5%) vs. 84 (88.4%) 2 (2.1%) | 3.265 (1.302-8.189) | 0.012 | TNM stage | III+IV vs. I+II Missing | 31 (32.6%) vs. 63 (66.3%) 2 (2.1%) | 2.443 (1.191-5.011) | 0.015 | Tumor grade | G3 vs. G1+G2 Missing | 21 (22.1%) vs. 65 (68.4%) 9 (9.5%) | 0.736 (0.277-1.950) | 0.537 | Tumor location | Lower vs. upper+middle Missing | 44 (46.3%) vs. 50 (52.6%) 1 (1.1%) | 0.958 (0.448-2.051) | 0.913 | Tobacco use | Yes vs. no | 51 (53.7%) vs. 44 (46.3%) | 1.965 (0.901-4.285) | 0.089 | Alcohol use | Yes vs. no Missing | 68 (71.6%) vs. 25 (26.3%) 2 (2.1%) | 2.172 (0.751-6.276) | 0.152 |
|
|
HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis; . |