Research Article

[Retracted] A Joint Model for Unbalanced Nested Repeated Measures with Informative Drop-Out Applied to Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Data

Table 3

Parameter estimates for DBP and informative dropout association based on the joint model and two-stage approach.

Parameter estimateJoint modelTwo-stage model∧∧
Longitudinal submodel for DBPMeanSD95% CIMeanSD95% CI

White race ()2.91550.0919(2.6600, 3.0470)4.00910.0100(3.9800, 4.0300)
BMI -score ()0.70680.0067(0.5653, 0.8165)0.00860.0000(0.000, 0.017)
 Variation components, random effects
 Between subjects, intercepts 5.60110.6043(4.5209, 6.8862)0.0600
 Covariance, intercept, and visits −0.18810.0405(−0.2781, −0.1170)
 Covariance, intercept, and slopes 0.01120.0167(−0.0214, 0.0439)
 Between subjects, visits 0.02460.0046(0.0171,0 .0353)0.0400
 Covariance, visits, and slopes −0.00060.0011(−0.0027, 0.0014)
 Between subjects, slopes 0.00580.0006(0.0047, 0.0071)0.0400
 Measurement error 0.01590.0002(0.0156, 0.0162)0.1200
Weibull submodel for dropout
Shape ()0.73880.1035(0.5456, 0.9610)1.00001.0300(0.9600, 1.0400)
Intercept ()4.65675.2972(−6.2182, 14.0500)
Age ()−0.03650.0609(−0.1572, 0.0818)−0.00000.03900(−0.2900, 0.4400)
Male gender ()−0.25940.2658(−0.7776, 0.2553)0.06800.1870(0.0680, −0.2500)
BMI -score ()−1.75780.9144(−3.3892, 0.1121)0.08000.0800(−0.7600, 0.2500)
White race ()−8.21743.8876(−15.5100, −0.2371)−0.24000.1900(−0.6200, 0.1300)
Mild group ()−0.42860.3381(−1.1130, 0.2078)0.15000.2300(−0.3000, 0.6000)
Severe group ()−0.19860.3650(−0.9393, 0.5088)0.24000.2300(−0.2200, 0.6900)
Random effects
Random intercepts ()−2.78111.3194(−5.2860, −0.0579)−1.40001.9700(−5.2700, 2.4700)
Random visits ()−22.99983.6157(−30.3305, −16.1298)−1.17003.2700(−7.5700, 5.2300)
Random slopes ()−1.35919.8496(−20.4918, 18.0111)−19.50004.3200(−27.9700, −11.0200)

BMI: body mass index; CI: credible interval; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation of parameter estimate. Group-specific splines included in the longitudinal submodel are reported in the supplement. Tables S6 and S7 in Section S4: the coefficients of the transformed natural cubic spline functions for the two-stage approach and the joint model; ∧∧parameter estimates evaluated using Wald test; 95% CI excludes 0.