Computerized Simulation Education on Physiotherapy Students’ Skills and Knowledge: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Risk of bias summary; three qualitative papers assessed by the JBI Checklist.

+	+	+	Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
+	+	+	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
+	+	+	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
+	+	+	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
+	+	+	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
+	+	+	Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
—	—	—	Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice-versa, addressed?
—	—	—	Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
+	+	+	Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
+	+	+	Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Ref. [42]	Ref. [20]	Ref. [37]

Scores: (+): yes (low risk of bias), (?): unclear, and (-) no (high risk of bias).