Research Article
Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia and Maxillary Occlusal Cant: A Cone Beam CT Study
Table 1
The difference in MOP cant and dental and mandibular factors among MSH factors within MSH subjects (
).
| | Unilateral 66 (82.5%) | Bilateral 14 (17.5%) | value | Type I 56 (70%) | Type II 20 (25%) | Type III 4 (5%) | value |
| MOP cant
(range) | (0–5.1) | (0.2–3.1) | 0.80 | (0–5.1) | (0–5) | (0–3.7) | 0.21 | (%) | 16 (20%) | 0 | 0.06ǂ | 11 (13.8%) | 5 (6.3%) | 0 | 0.5ǂ | TMJ-DJD (%) | 19 (23.8%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0.26Ɨ | 15 (18.8%) | 6 (7.5%) | 0 | 0.4ǂ | Open bite (%) | 11 (13.8%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0.36Ɨ | 6 (7.5%) | 4 (5.0%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0.08Ɨ | Cross bite (%) | 7 (8.8%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0.69Ɨ | 5 (6.3%) | 4 (5.0%) | 0 | 0.3ǂ |
|
|
Kruskal-Wallis test. ƗChi-squared test. ǂFisher’s exact test. TMJ-DJD: temporomandibular joint-degenerative joint disease. |