Review Article

The Outcome of Sutureless in Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Characteristics of included studies in the review.

Author, year (ref.)T stageStudy designRenorrhaphy techniqueSutureless techniqueOutcomesSQ

Zhang, F., 2021 [17]T1RTP, PSMSutureless ()
Double-layer suture ()
Monopolar coagulation; NBCASurgical approach, OT, WIT, EBL, positive, surgical margin, length of stay, postoperative complications, eGFR6
Farinha, R., 2021 [8]T1–2RTP, PSMSutureless ()
Double-layer suture ()
Bipolar or monopolar coagulation; hemostatic agentsOT, WIT, EBL, length of stay, postoperative complications, eGFR, AKI9
Jin, D., 2020 [9]T1aRTP, PSMSutureless ()
Double-layer suture ()
Monopolar coagulation; hemostatic agentsOT, WIT, EBL, conversion to nephrectomy, length of stay, postoperative complications, eGFR, AKI8
Tiscione, D., 2019 [11]T1–2RTPSutureless ()
Double-layer suture ()
Fibrin glueOT, WIT, EBL, length of stay, postoperative complications, eGFR, pathologic and follow-up findings6
Nakamura, K., 2020 [12]T1RTP, PSMSutureless ()
Double-layer suture ()
Soft COAGOT, WIT, EBL, eGFR, positive surgical margin6

PSM: propensity score matching; RTP: retrospective; OT: operating time; WIT: warm ischemia time; EBL: estimated blood loss; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; NBCA: N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate; AKI: acute kidney injury; SQ: study quality according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.