Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Role of BIRC6 Serum Level

Banakar, Morteza; Ardekani, Shima Torabi; Zare, Razieh; Malekzadeh, Mahyar; Mirhadi, Hosein; Khademi, Bijan; Rokaya, Dinesh

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5425478

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5425478 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5425478

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Role of BIRC6 Serum Level

Morteza Banakar,^1,2Shima Torabi Ardekani,³Razieh Zare,³Mahyar Malekzadeh,⁴Hosein Mirhadi,⁵Bijan Khademi,⁶and Dinesh Rokaya⁷

Academic Editor: Rajalakshmanan Eswaramoorthy

Received29 Jun 2022

Accepted09 Aug 2022

Published18 Aug 2022

Abstract

Background. Different factors are involved in the incidence, etiology, metastasis, diagnosis, and treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma, including apoptosis inhibitor proteins. Baculoviral IAP repeat containing protein 6 (BIRC6) is one of the apoptosis inhibitor proteins contributing to cancer cells’ survival in many cancer types with diagnostic and treatment importance. This study is aimed at assessing the serum level of BIRC6 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 60 serum samples were collected from 45 male and 15 female patients with a mean age of 61 years as the case group and 28 serum samples of healthy people as a control group. The serum samples were analyzed using a commercial sandwich ELISA kit. Results. There were no significant differences between BIRC6 serum levels in patients and healthy subjects. Moreover, we did not observe any significant relationships between BIRC6 serum levels and the patients’ demographic or clinical characteristics. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in serum BIRC6 levels in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and healthy individuals. Its use in determining the prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma or considering it a determinant marker in this type of cancer may not have a place. More in-depth studies for evaluating BIRC6 serum levels in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients are recommended for better insight into this protein’s role in diagnosing, progression, and prognosis of the disease.

1. Introduction

Oral cancers are the most common malignancy in Asian countries and consist of more than 50% of all cancers [1]. Oral carcinoma is the sixth most common malignancy in men and 15^th in women [2]. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common oral cancer, an invasive epithelial neoplasm, with variable degrees of squamous differentiation, with or without keratinization [3]. In a study on the epidemiology of oral cancers in Iran, SCC, with an average prevalence of 70.0%, is the most common cancer among oral cancers [4]. SCC comprised at least 90 percent of oral neoplasms [5]. When studying the ten-year prevalence of oral cancers in Iran, 48% of all cancers were squamous cell carcinoma [6, 7]. There are 30000 new disease cases and 7400 deaths annually in the United States. However, average yearly incidence and mortality were variable among different races, minorities, sex, and age groups [8, 9].

Different factors are involved in the incidence, etiology, metastasis, diagnosis, and treatment of the SCC, including the apoptosis inhibitor proteins [10]. Baculoviral IAP repeat containing protein 6 (BIRC6) is one of the apoptosis inhibitor proteins, which shows its inhibitory function by binding with preapoptosis factors and leading to an apoptosis inhibitory effect [11]; therefore, it contributes to the survival of cancer cells of many cancer types [12]. BIRC6 exerts its inhibitory effects through binding to caspase and leads to cell resistance like other IAPs proteins such as DIABLO [13]. BIRC6 increases cancer invasion to different tissues, disease recurrence, resistance to different treatments such as chemotherapy, and severity [11]. Therefore, this protein has diagnostic and treatment importance.

The role of BIRC6 in many cancer types has been investigated, including the brain, leukemia, osteosarcoma, colon, and lung [14]. According to previous studies, overexpression of BIRC6 is associated with higher cell proliferation, poorer prognosis, and worse clinical findings at the time of cancer diagnosis [15], in which we can point to the investigation of the role of BIRC6 in colorectal cancer [15], hepatocellular cancer [16], non-small-cell lung cancer [11], epithelial ovarian cancer [17], prostate cancer [18], lung tissue cancers [19], esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [20, 21], gastric carcinoma [22], acute leukemia, and acute myeloblastic leukemia [23]. However, the BIRC6 level has not been studied in oral cancers.

This study is aimed at investigating the presence of BIRC6 as a biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Determining the role of this marker in oral cancers can significantly impact the prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of oral cancers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Science (IR.SUMS.REC.1397.203). In this cross-sectional study, 60 serum samples from those affected by oral SCC, including 45 male and 15 female patients with a mean age of years as a case group, and 28 serum samples of healthy individuals, including 20 men and 8 women with a mean age of years as a control group were collected. All participants were hospitalized in the ENT units of the Shiraz Khalili hospital. SCC diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically. Participants who suffered from other malignancies by history, inflammatory, or infectious diseases (in the last three years) have been excluded from the study. The control group consisted of healthy volunteers without any history of cancer, inflammatory or infectious diseases on their own, and first-degree family in the last three years. The informed consent form was completed and signed by all the study participants at the beginning of the study.

2.2. Sampling

The blood samples were taken by venipuncture method and then centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Then, aliqouted serum samples were stored at -80°C for future analysis. After completing the sample, the BIRC6 concentrations were measured using a Sandwich ELISA kit (MyBioSource: Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 6 (BIRC6), ELISA Kit) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The ELISA kit contains a 96-well microplate, precoated with the anti-BIRC6 monoclonal antibody. In order to perform the ELISA Sandwich assay, the manual of the MyBioSource BIRC6 ELISA (MBS760993) kit was followed.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We excluded 3 of 88 samples (2 cases and one control) from our calculations because the resulting concentration exceeded the kit’s detection range (0.156-10 ng/ml). The BIRC6 concentrations of case and control samples were compared using the Mann–Whitney statistic. Furthermore, the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis statistics have been used for testing the association between serum BIRC6 concentration and clinical findings. The value of less than 0.05 was statistically considered significant. Moreover, the correlation between age and BIRC6 concentration was evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation.

3. Results

In this retrospective study, SCC clinical samples were used. The demographic characteristics and clinical findings of patients who had been studied for BIRC6 serum levels were summarized in Table 1. The average age of the case () and control () was about 61 years, in the 35-88 years age range. The sex distribution of male and female participants of both groups was approximately 3 : 1. There were two exclusions in the case group and 1 in the control group due to highly exceeding the kit’s detection range.

Findings showed that the mean of BIRC6 serum levels in SCC cases was ng/ml, which was higher than the control group with a ng/ml difference was not statistically significant (). BIRC6 serum levels were and ng/ml in men and women, respectively; however, the difference was not statistically significant between the sexes (). Moreover, the BIRC6 serum levels were increased by age, but this increase wasn’t statistically significant (, ). Table 2 shows the correlation between BIRC6 serum levels of the participants.

The results of comparing the BIRC6 concentration and clinicopathological findings of the patients were presented in Table 3. There were not any significant relationships between BIRC6 serum levels and clinical characteristics of the stage, tumor size, metastasis, and site of cancer.

4. Discussion

Cancer prognosis is determined based on the different clinical characteristics, response to administered treatments, and cellular or serum markers. One of the proteins which have currently been used as a predictor of different cancer prognoses such as acute leukemia [23], ovarian epithelial cell carcinoma [17], prostate cancer [24], and other cancer types was BIRC6. Successful treatment of various cancer types requires controlling the disease severity and metastasis. In addition to common treatment modalities such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, one of the recommended ways to control the cancer severity and metastasis and prevent lymph node involvement is to control the expression of various genes and proteins such as BIRC6.

This study included 85 participants (58 patients and 27 healthy cases) for BIRC6 serum levels. Findings did not show any significant association between BIRC6 levels of SCC patients and healthy subjects (). However, previous studies reported a significant association between the BIRC6 level of patients and healthy subjects, including colorectal cancers [15], lung [19], and prostate cancer [24]. A study by Lee et al. on the association between BIRC6 expression rate and clinical symptoms of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in 80 patients did not show any significant association between BIRC6 expression rate and variables such as age, sex, size, and differentiation of the cancer cells, while the relationships with lymph node involvement, stage, and metastasis were significant [21]. Our finding did not show any significant correlation between BIRC6 level and age, sex, tumor size, and stage, which was consistent with previous studies. However, we did not observe any significant association between BIRC6 serum levels and clinicopathological variables such as metastasis, lymph node involvement, size, and stage.

As noted, the finding did not show any association between BIRC6 serum level and clinical characteristics of oral squamous cell carcinoma, such as lymph node involvement. Although previous studies have shown a significant association between BIRC6 expression and lymph node involvement in lung cancer, lymphoma, thyroid cancer, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the higher the BIRC6 serum level, the more lymph node involved in the disease. Ma and colleagues found a significant association between BIRC6 expression with cancer metastasis and lymph involvement [25]; however, this is not applicable in oral squamous cell carcinoma. According to our findings, no significant association has been found between the BIRC6 level and metastasis or lymph node involvement.

Because there was no significant relationship between BIRC6 protein and clinical characteristics of this cancer type, we can conclude that BIRC6 may not have any significant role in predicting oral squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, targeting this protein or corresponding gene may not help in the reduction of oral squamous cell carcinoma severity. This can be due to some limitations that any experimental study can suffer. Despite our precision in performing the study and quantitative measurement of the BIRC6 level using an ELISA kit, many factors such as metabolism, elimination of BIRC6 from blood and serum, and its half-life can impact our results. Moreover, the main purpose of this project was to measure the BIRC6 in blood samples as a low-aggressive low-risk method. Therefore, we recommend a more extensive investigation on BIRC6 expression in the tissue and serum with a bigger sample size of oral squamous cell carcinoma and different test types.

5. Conclusion

It showed that the BIRC6 serum level did not have any significant association with age, sex, tumor size, differentiation, metastasis, lymph node involvement, and site of cancer. Moreover, we did not find any differences between patients and healthy subjects regarding BIRC6 serum levels. Therefore, for better generalization, we recommend a more in-depth study of the subject matter using a larger sample size using different molecular tests in order to understand the role of BIRC6 serum level and expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning this article’s research, authorship, and/or publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Dental Research Development Center of the School of Dentistry for the statistical analysis.

References

J. A. Regezi, J. J. Sciubba, and R. C. Jordan, Oral Pathology: Clinical Pathologic Correlations, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016.
K. Dhanuthai, S. Rojanawatsirivej, W. Thosaporn et al., “Oral cancer: a multicenter study,” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. e23–e29, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Rivera, A. K. Oliveira, R. A. P. Costa, T. De Rossi, and A. F. P. Leme, “Prognostic biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review,” Oral Oncology, vol. 72, pp. 38–47, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Maleki, M. Ghojazadeh, S.-S. Mahmoudi et al., “Epidemiology of oral cancer in Iran: a systematic review,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 5427–5432, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Green Berg, M. Glick, and S. Ja, Burkets Oral Medicine, BC Decker, 10th edition, 2016.
A. Ala-Aghbali, S. Vosugh-Hosseini, M. Moradzadeh et al., “A ten year study of oral squamous cell carcinoma cases in the Guilan province,” Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 84, pp. 71–76, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Keshani, S. Jalayer, and M. Esfahani, “Prevalence of oral squamous cell carcinoma cases for ten years in Qazvin province (2003-13),” Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 95–99, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Sasahira and T. Kirita, “Hallmarks of cancer-related newly prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 2413, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. W. Neville and T. A. Day, “Oral cancer and precancerous lesions,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 195–215, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Dwivedi, R. Pandey, S. Chandra, and D. Mehrotra, “Apoptosis and genes involved in oral cancer-a comprehensive review,” Oncology Reviews, vol. 14, no. 2, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Dong, D. Lin, C. Low et al., “Elevated expression of BIRC6 protein in non-small-cell lung cancers is associated with cancer recurrence and chemoresistance,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. U. I. Luk, H. Xue, H. Cheng et al., “The BIRC6 gene as a novel target for therapy of prostate cancer: dual targeting of inhibitors of apoptosis,” Oncotarget, vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 6896–6908, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ikeda, “The anti-apoptotic ubiquitin conjugating enzyme BIRC6/BRUCE regulates autophagosome-lysosome fusion,” Autophagy, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1283-1284, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Low, I. S. Luk, D. Lin et al., “BIRC6 protein, an inhibitor of apoptosis: role in survival of human prostate cancer cells,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, article e55837, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hu, S. Weng, W. Tang et al., “Overexpression of BIRC6 is a predictor of prognosis for colorectal cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 5, article e0125281, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Tang, R. Xue, S. Weng et al., “BIRC6 promotes hepatocellular carcinogenesis: interaction of BIRC 6 with p53 facilitating p53 degradation,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. E475–E487, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, Y. J. Chen, J. Hou et al., “Expression and clinical significance of BIRC6 in human epithelial ovarian cancer,” Tumour Biology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 4891–4896, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhuang, C. Zhang, F. Hao, and X. Sun, “Baculoviral IAP repeat containing 6 (BIRC6) is a predictor of prognosis in prostate cancer,” Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, vol. 24, pp. 839–845, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Gharabaghi, “Diagnostic investigation of BIRC 6 and SIRT 1 protein expression level as potential prognostic biomarkers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer,” The Clinical Respiratory Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 633–638, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Salehi, A. H. Jafarian, and M. M. Forghanifard, “Expression analysis of BRUCE protein in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 24, pp. 47–51, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Li, B. L. Chen, Y. W. Zhou et al., “Expression and clinical significance of Apollon in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1933–1940, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Salehi, A. H. Jafarian, M. Montazer, M. Moghbeli, and M. M. Forghanifard, “BRUCE protein, new marker for targeted therapy of gastric carcinoma,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 151–155, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. R. Ismail, H. M. Mahmoud, L. M. Tawfik et al., “BIRC6/Apollon gene expression in childhood acute leukemia: impact on therapeutic response and prognosis,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 118–127, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. U. Luk, R. Shrestha, H. Xue et al., “BIRC6 targeting as potential therapy for advanced, enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1542–1551, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Ma, L. Guo, L. Shan, X. Liu, N. Lyu, and J. Ying, “Homogeneity and high concordance of ALK translocation in primary lung adenocarcinoma and paired lymph node metastasis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 10961, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Morteza Banakar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies