Research Article
Two-Stage Hybrid Approach of Deep Learning Networks for Interstitial Lung Disease Classification
Table 2
Comparative performance assessment of average DSC and
for c-GAN and existing methods for lung segmentation.
| Disease | Performance | Present study | NMF [34] | UNet [35] | ResNet [31] | VGG16 [10] | MobileNet [36] |
| Fibrosis | DSC | 0.9566 | 0.7681 | 0.9485 | 0.9126 | 0.9295 | 0.9040 | | 0.9290 | 0.6600 | 0.9117 | 0.8681 | 0.8742 | 0.8330 |
| Ground glass | DSC | 0.9558 | 0.8335 | 0.9534 | 0.9351 | 0.9444 | 0.9291 | | 0.9282 | 0.7473 | 0.9191 | 0.8987 | 0.8975 | 0.8706 |
| Emphysema | DSC | 0.9378 | 0.9214 | 0.9629 | 0.9261 | 0.9452 | 0.9380 | | 0.9204 | 0.8917 | 0.9340 | 0.8975 | 0.8963 | 0.8841 |
| Consolidation | DSC | 0.9712 | 0.8775 | 0.9500 | 0.9440 | 0.9479 | 0.9436 | | 0.9466 | 0.7963 | 0.9148 | 0.9076 | 0.9031 | 0.8954 |
| Micronodule | DSC | 0.9812 | 0.9678 | 0.9807 | 0.9674 | 0.9751 | 0.9586 | | 0.9645 | 0.9391 | 0.9627 | 0.9379 | 0.9523 | 0.9210 |
|
|