Research Article

Performance of Universal Adhesives in Composite Resin Repair

Table 2

μTBS values (MPa) and reduction by aging (%).

Surface treatmentMicrotensile bond strength
Etch modeGroupFresh repair (MPa)Aged repair (MPa)Reduction by aging (%)

N/ANC33.70 (5.85)D18.68 (3.46)e44.6

N/AA43.67 (2.82)C18.61 (3.70)e57.4

Etch-and-rinseSBM46.52 (6.00)C27.67 (4.23)d40.5
SBU65.90 (7.04)A46.29 (4.71)ab29.8
ABU61.39 (2.52)AB38.96 (3.02)bc36.5
TBU59.78 (3.06)AB41.35 (4.53)b30.8

Self-etchCSE46.34 (3.93)C32.63 (3.59)cd29.6
SBU62.28 (7.62)AB51.76 (8.91)a16.9
ABU57.71 (9.08)B46.18 (7.23)ab20.0
TBU59.47 (9.05)AB36.46 (8.47)bc38.7

Standard deviation is shown in parentheses. Within the same column, values with different superscript capital letters and lowercase letters were statistically significantly different among fresh and aged repairs (Tukey HSD, ). indicates a significant reduction in bond strength of each group after 10,000 thermocycles (-test, where ). N/A: not applicable; NC: negative control; SBM: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; SBU: Single Bond Universal; ABU: All Bond Universal; TBU: Tetric N-Bond Universal; CSE: Clearfil SE Bond.