Review Article
Effect of Different Membranes on Vertical Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Table 4
Node-splitting analysis of inconsistency.
| Side | Direct | Indirect | Difference | MD | SE | MD | SE | MD | SE | |
| d-PTFE vs CM | 0.4357833 | 0.5289967 | 1.163483 | 1.104742 | −0.7277 | 1.224864 | 0.552 | d-PTFE vs TM + CCM | −0.992163 | 0.3874848 | −0.8464555 | 1.17107 | 0.7472392 | 1.233511 | 0.545 | e-PTFE vs CM | 0.2239182 | 0.2175388 | 0.7504707 | 14.15419 | −0.5265525 | 14.15584 | 0.970 | e-PTFE vs PLA | 0.2455775 | 0.3966155 | −0.7071713 | 44.73296 | 0.9527488 | 44.73485 | 0.983 | e-PTFE vs PEG | 0.0640996 | 0.369438 | −0.6947047 | 44.73486 | 0.7588043 | 44.73644 | 0.986 | CCM vs CM | 0.2286887 | 0.2530728 | 1.142997 | 31.63677 | −0.9143078 | 31.63774 | 0.977 | CM vs titanium-reinforced e-PTFE | −0.3001702 | 0.3116784 | 0.4459553 | 1.193876 | −0.7461255 | 1.233879 | 0.545 | TM vs TM + CM | −0.155983 | 0.4390793 | 1.3408 | 2.415155 | −1.496783 | 2.468483 | 0.544 | TM vs TM + CCM | −0.0779806 | 0.4261512 | 0.6701218 | 1.158239 | −0.7481025 | 1.234139 | 0.544 | TM vs titanium-reinforced d-PTFE | 1.244603 | 0.8095491 | 0.4960574 | 0.9320917 | 0.7485455 | 1.234571 | 0.544 | TM + CM vs TM + CCM | 0.0779914 | 0.3843957 | 1.57247 | 2.441477 | −1.494478 | 2.467023 | 0.545 | Titanium-reinforced e-PTFE vs titanium-reinforced d-PTFE | −0.3406294 | 0.40123 | −1.088411 | 1.167402 | 0.7477821 | 1.234428 | 0.545 |
|
|