Research Article
High-Resolution Histopathological Image Classification Model Based on Fused Heterogeneous Networks with Self-Supervised Feature Representation
Table 2
Classification performance comparison of different models on TCGA dataset.
| | Model | Acc | Precision | Recall | F1 score | AccImp |
| H | VGG | 0.790 | 0.791 | 0.795 | 0.789 | − | GoogleNet | 0.780 | 0.812 | 0.799 | 0.779 | − | ResNet | 0.820 | 0.827 | 0.830 | 0.820 | − | DenseNet | 0.820 | 0.830 | 0.830 | 0.820 | − |
| J | Model 1 | 0.860 | 0.858 | 0.863 | 0.859 | 4.9% | Model 2 | 0.840 | 0.840 | 0.845 | 0.839 | 2.4% | Model 3 | 0.850 | 0.848 | 0.847 | 0.847 | 3.7% | Model 4 | 0.880 | 0.883 | 0.873 | 0.877 | 7.3% | Model 5 | 0.890 | 0.889 | 0.887 | 0.888 | 8.5% |
|
|