Research Article

The Effect of Simulated Chewing on the Surface Roughness of Direct and Indirect Resin-Composites Opposed by Zirconia: An In Vitro Study

Table 1

The composition and manufacturer details of the tested materials.

Trade nameTypeCompositionBatch number/shadeManufacturer

Tested resin-composite materialsTetric EvoCeramNanohybrid, direct resin-compositeThe matrix is 17–18 wt% dimethacrylate resin. Fillers contain barium glass, ytterbium trifluoride, mixed oxides, and prepolymer (82–83 wt%). The mean filler particle size is <550 nm.590313/shade A2Ivoclar Vivadent limited, Enderby, Leicester, UK
SinfonyMicrohybrid, indirect lab resin-compositeThe matrix comprises 48 wt% mixture of aliphatic and cycloaliphatic monomers. Fillers: 40 wt% strontium aluminium borosilicate glass of mean particle diameter 0.5–0.7 μm as macrofiller and 5 wt% pyrogenic silica as microfiller.049310/shade E23M ESPE AG, Seefeld, Germany
The antagonist zirconia ceramicLava plusSecond generation high translucency zirconia3 mol% yttria partially stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (<15% cubic phase in zirconia, ≤0.5% Al2O3).357797/shade A33M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA