Research Article

Effects of Neurodynamic Mobilization on Health-Related Quality of Life and Cervical Deep Flexors Endurance in Patients of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Trial

Table 3

Comparison of the baseline craniocervical flexion and 8 domain of SF 36 between the experimental and control group.

VariableGroup ()

Baseline IQRBaseline mean ranksMan Whitney USig. (2-tailed) and effect size (Cohen’s )

Craniocervical flexionExperimental21 (20 to 24)42.24868.50,
Control22 (20 to 24)46.76
Physical functioning–SF36Experimental35 (20 to 55)42.82894.0,
Control40 (21.25 to 55)46.18
Role limitation due to physical health–SF36Experimental0 (0 to 25)46.30889.0,
Control0 (0 to 0)42.70
Role limitation due to emotional problem–SF36Experimental0 (0 to 33)42.73890.0,
Control16.65 (0 to 66.7)46.27
Energy/fatigue–SF36Experimental45 (30.5 to 50)44.69959.50,
Control42.5 (35 to 50)44.31
Emotional wellbeing–SF36Experimental52 (44 to 60)46.73870.0,
Control52 (40 to 56)42.27
Social functioning–SF36Experimental43.75 (37.5 to 62.5)42.94899.50,
Control50 (37.5 to 62.5)46.6
Pain–SF36Experimental45 (43.12 to 45)43.24912.50,
Control45 (45 to 45)45.76
General health perception–SF36Experimental40 (35 to 55)47.76824.50,
Control35 (31.25 to 45)41.24