Research Article

Evaluation of Genotoxic Effect and Antigenotoxic Potential against DNA Damage of the Aqueous and Ethanolic Leaf Extracts of Annona muricata Using an In Vivo Erythrocyte Rodent Micronucleus Assay

Table 5

Evaluation of the antigenotoxic effect and %DR of A. muricata aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts against CP-induced damage in MNEs cell count in mouse peripheral blood.

MNEs/10,000 TEs
Sampling time
Doses0 h24 h48 h72 h96 h120 h

NC
: 5
Sterile water

PC
: 5
CP

CP+aqueous extract A. muricata
: 5
60 mg/kg+187.5 mg/kg
NSNS0.0100.0010.001
%DR62.26%64.56%54.82%84.21%46.38%
60 mg/kg+375 mg/kg
NSNS0.0010.0010.001
%DR52.83%81.01%86.80%81.95%62.32%
60 mg/kg+750 mg/kg
NSNS0.0100.0010.002
%DR47.17%59.49%68.02%69.17%40.58%

CP+EtOH extract A. muricata
: 5
60 mg/kg+187.5 mg/kg
NSNSNS0.0010.003
%DR35.85%44.30%55.84%65.41%60.87%
60 mg/kg+375 mg/kg
NSNS0.0020.0010.009NS
%DR66.04%70.89%65.48%57.89%62.32%
60 mg/kg+750 mg/kg
0.037NS0.0590.001NS
%DR58.49%46.84%57.36%43.61%31.88%

Data are expressed as . One-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett -test for multiple post hoc pairwise comparisons versus the PC was employed to correct the significance () values for intergroup analysis. %DR: percentage of damage reduction; CP: cyclophosphamide; MNEs: micronucleated erythrocytes; : mice per group; NC: negative control; NS: not significant; PC: positive control; TEs: total erythrocytes.