Research Article

Effects of Two Different Acid Etching and Surface Washing Methods on Bond Strength on Different CAD-CAM Blocks under Aging Protocols

Table 3

Comparison of bond strength values according to surface treatments and blocks.

Surface treatmentsBlock
e.max CADCeltra Duo
TSTLTSTL

HF + W17.71±.41Aa9.48±.25Aa19.02±.32Ba11.76±.28Ba
HF + PA18.96±.27Ab11.84±.35Ab20.11±.32Bb13.32±.18Bb
HF + US20.07±.31Ac13.72±.19Ac22.29±.19Bb16.33±.18Bc
MEP + W16.08±.20Ad7.63±.27Ad17.23±.13Bc9.47±.22Bd
MEP + PA13.09±.30Ae5.88±.38Ae14.75±.25Ba7.81±.39Ba
MEP + US18.22±.10Af11.55±.18Ab20.31±.20Bb14.11±.25Be

Mean values (MPa) with the same letter do not differ significantly from each other. Capital letters indicate significant differences between TSs and between TLs (); lower case letters indicate differences between surface treatments in each column ().