Critical Care Research and Practice / 2020 / Article / Tab 4 / Review Article
Effectiveness, Safety, and Barriers to Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit Table 4 Outcome measures for assessing the effectiveness of early mobilization on mobility in the intensive care unit.
Author (year) Outcome measure No. of items Total score Psychometric properties Tipping et al. [53 ] (2016) ICU Mobility Scale 11 0–10 Valid Responsive Acceptable floor and the ceiling effect Perme et al. [52 ] (2014) Kawaguchi et al. [54 ] (2016) Perme ICU Mobility Score 15 0–32 Higher score—few potential mobility restrictions and decreased assistance Lower score—more potential restrictions to mobility and more assistance needed for mobility Valid High reliability (α > 0.90) Corner et al. [55 ] (2014) Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool 10 0–50 Valid Limited floor and the ceiling effect Denehy et al. [56 ] (2013) Interval scores Physical Function ICU Test (PFIT-s) 4 0–12 Valid MCID = 1.5points (on interval of 10) Thrush et al. [57 ] (2012) Huang et al. [58 ] (2016) Functional status score for intensive care unit (FSS-ICU) 5 0–35 Higher the score, better the physical functioning Valid Responsive Good internal consistency MCID = 2–5 Kasotakis et al. [59 ] (2012) Surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score (SOMS) 5 0–4 Higher the score, better the mobility Valid Reliable