Research Article

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Table 1

Selected studies evaluating prevalence and outcomes of platelet refractoriness.

StudyTypePopulationMethodPrevalenceClinical outcomes

Legler et al., 1997 [4]Prospective cohort145 patients with hemato-oncological disease at a single center, who received at least two platelet transfusionsPlatelet counts repeatedly after ≥two successive platelet transfusions within 48 hours < 20000 × 106/L (16-hr count) or <10000 × 106/L (24-hr count)27.6%Not assessed

TRAP study, 1997 [5]Randomized clinical trial530 patients receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemiaCCI <5000 after two sequential transfusions10%No comparison between refractory and nonrefractory patients reported

Meehan et al., 2000 [6]Prospective cohort292 consecutive patients at a single hospital who received platelet transfusions over a six-month periodThree consecutive days of platelet transfusions produced posttransfusion platelet count increments (corrected or uncorrected) ≤ 5000 × 106/L21.6%Among refractory patients (compared to nonrefractory)
(i) Increased mean platelet use (units): 20.6 vs. 2.8,  < 0.0001
(ii) Increased mean hospitalization costs (US $): 103,956 vs. 36,818,  < 0.0001
(iii) Increased mean length of stay: 35.0 vs. 14.4 days,  < 0.0001

Slichter et al., 2005 [7]Ad hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial533 patients receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia2 sequential 1-hour posttransfusion platelet increments of less than 11000 × 106/L27%Not assessed

Kerkhoffs et al., 2008 [8]Ad hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial117 patients hospitalized in the hematology ward who needed or were expected to need 2 or more platelet transfusions1-hour CCI <7500 and/or a 24-hour CCI <450049.6%Among refractory (compared to nonrefractory patients)
(i) Decreased 100-day survival (83% vs. 98%,  < 0.01)
(ii) Decreased median survival (491.0 days (Q1, Q3: 156.0, 858.0) vs. 825 days (Q1, Q3: 355.0, 996.0),  = 0.032)
(iii) Increased risk of bleeding: odds ratio: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.1–11

Ferreira et al., 2011 [9]Prospective cohort16 adult oncology/hematology patientsTwo successive transfusions with CCI <500019% (3 patients)Not assessed

Hess et al., 2016 [10]Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial734 hematology-oncology patients receiving at least 2 platelet transfusionsTwo consecutive CCIs of ≤500014%Not assessed

Comont et al., 2017 [11]Retrospective cohort897 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving intensive chemotherapyPersistent thrombocytopenia <10000 × 106/L despite at least two successive daily platelet transfusions4.8%Among patient with refractoriness (compared to those without)
(i) Increased severe bleeding events (22% vs. 4.1%,  < 0.0001)
(ii) Increased early death caused by bleeding (12.2% vs. 1.4%,  = 0.0006)
(iii) Increased death by bleeding at any time (24.4% vs. 5.3%,  < 0.0001)

CCI: corrected count increment, CI: confidence interval, Q1: first quartile, Q3: third quartile.