Research Article

Comparison of Treatment Approaches and Subsequent Outcomes within a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Registry

Table 1

Patient characteristics and outcomes by primary outcome (treatment approach).

CharacteristicsOverall N = 1832Anticoagulation monotherapy, N = 1440Delayed advanced PE intervention (>12 hours) N = 113Immediate advanced PE intervention (within 12 hours) N = 279P value (difference by ANOVA or chi-square)

Demographics
Mean age, years (SD)62.8 (16.0)64.3 (15.9)57.3 (14.8)57.5 (15.5)<0.001
Gender: cis male, n (%)890 (48.6%)690 (47.9%)61.0 (54.0%)139 (49.8%)0.438
Gender: cis female, n (%)942 (51.4%)750 (52.1%)52.0 (46.0%)140 (50.2%)

Race, n (%)
Caucasian1125 (61.4%)891 (61.9%)70 (61.9%164 (58.8%)0.713
African-American642 (35.0%)492 (34.2%)40 (35.4%)110 (39.4%)
American-Indian/Alaskan16 (0.9%)15 (1.0%)1 (0.9%)0 (0%)
Asian5 (0.3%)4 (0.3%)0 (0%)1 (0.4%)
Pacific Islander1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Other9 (0.5%)9 (0.6%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Missing34 (1.9%)28 (1.9%)2 (1.8%)4 (1.4%)

Ethnicity, n (%)
Hispanic43 (2.3%)35 (2.4%)1 (0.9%)7 (2.5%)0.799
Non-Hispanic1704 (93.0%)1336 (92.8%)106 (93.8%)262 (93.9%)
Other85 (4.6%)69 (4.8%)6 (5.3%)10 (3.6%)

Initially eligible for advanced PE intervention, n (%)
Yes855 (46.7%)564 (39.2%)71 (62.8%)220 (78.9%)<0.001
No977 (53.3%)876 (60.8%)42 (37.2%)59 (21.1%)

PE severity at presentationn (%)
High risk139 (7.6%)53 (3.7%)7 (6.2%)79 (28.3%)<0.001
Intermediate-high risk707 (38.6%)512 (35.6%)62 (54.9%)133 (47.7%)
Intermediate-low risk977 (53.3%)868 (60.3%)44 (38.9%)65 (23.3%)
Low risk9 (0.5%)7 (0.5%)0 (0%)2 (0.7%)

Bleeding risk assessment, n (%)
High248 (13.5%)200 (13.9%)21 (18.6%)27 (9.7%)<0.001
Moderate915 (49.9%)748 (51.9%)42 (37.2%)125 (44.8%)
Low669 (36.5%)492 (34.2%)50 (44.2%)127 (45.5%)

Initial PE severity/bleeding risk profile, n (%)
High PE/high bleeding risk34 (1.9%)17 (1.2%)4 (3.5%)13 (4.7%)<0.001
High PE/moderate bleeding risk62 (3.4%)28 (1.9%)1 (0.9%)33 (11.8%)
High PE/low bleeding risk43 (2.3%)8 (0.6%)2 (1.8%)33 (11.8%)
Intermediate-high PE/high bleeding risk113 (6.2%)90 (6.3%)12 (10.6%)11 (3.9%)
Intermediate-high PE/moderate bleeding risk355 (19.4%)267 (18.5%)22 (19.5%)66 (23.7%)
Intermediate-high PE/low bleeding risk239 (13.0%)155 (10.8%)28 (24.8%)56 (20.1%)
Intermediate-low PE/high bleeding risk101 (5.5%)93 (6.5%)5 (4.4%)3 (1.1%)
Intermediate-low PE/moderate bleeding risk494 (27.0%)450 (31.3%)19 (16.8%)25 (9.0%)
Intermediate-low PE/low bleeding risk391 (21.3%)332 (23.1%)20 (17.7%)39 (14.0%)

Clinical outcomes
Death39 (2.7%)12 (10.6%)43 (15.4%)94 (5.1%)<0.001
Clinical deterioration98 (6.8%)18 (15.9%)102 (36.6%)218 (11.9%)<0.001

The percentages within each cell were calculated using the N in the column header for that cell (e.g., of all patients who received anticoagulation monotherapy, 53/1440 (3.7%) were classified as high-risk PE at ED presentation. Conversely, all 139 (38.1%) high-risk PE patients in this study had anticoagulation monotherapy). We found the following proportions for each criterion used to determine PE severity: 81% had a RV : LV ratio of 1.0 or greater as determined by CT, 22% had RV dilatation by echocardiography, 3.2% arrived in cardiac arrest, 5.0% required vasopressor support at presentation, 5.6% had sustained hypotension, 5.2% had episodic hypotension, 17.8% had a sustained elevated shock index, 36.2% had hypoxia with respiratory distress at rest, 68% had elevated troponin, and 57.2% had elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels.