Comparison of Treatment Approaches and Subsequent Outcomes within a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Registry
Table 5
Multivariable analyses of primary (ordinal) and secondary outcomes.
Predictors
Primary outcome (ordinal)
Secondary outcomes
Advanced PE intervention
Clinical deterioration
Major bleeding
Odds ratio
Confidence interval
value
Odds ratios
Confidence interval
value
Odds ratio
Confidence interval
value
(Intercept)
0.02
0.02–0.04
<0.001
0.03
0.02–0.05
<0.001
Intervention (delayed >12 hrs later)
NA
NA
NA
2.66
1.41–5.01
0.003
3.34
1.79–6.21
0.001
Intervention (within 12 hrs)
NA
NA
NA
3.55
2.31–5.44
<0.001
5.23
3.50–7.81
<0.001
Moderate bleeding risk
0.71
0.61–0.83
<0.001
1.20
0.79–1.82
0.388
1.09
0.71–1.67
0.701
High bleeding risk
0.58
0.46–0.73
<0.001
1.45
0.83–2.51
0.189
1.90
1.10–3.24
0.019
Intermediate-high risk PE
1.90
1.64–2.20
<0.001
2.61
1.68–4.04
<0.001
1.02
0.66–1.59
0.914
High-risk PE
5.32
4.17–6.79
<0.001
56.33
31.99–99.21
<0.001
3.35
1.92–5.80
<0.001
Observations†
1823
1823
R2 nagelkerke 0.174
R2 tjur 0.366
R2 tjur
0.081
Ordinal regression for primary outcome (treatment approach); multivariable analysis for binary secondary outcomes (clinical deterioration and major bleeding). Note. NA = not applicable, PE = pulmonary embolism. †The number of observations is less than the study sample size due to missing data for some patients.
