Review Article

Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Table 4

Results of the ROBIS assessments.

Section/topicLiu et al., 2012 (China) [26]Yu et al., 2013 (China) [27]Zhang et al., 2013 (China) [28]Qian, 2013 (China) [29]Guo et al., 2013 (China) [30]Zhang et al., 2014 (China) [31]Zhang et al., 2017 (China) [32]Zhu and Ding, 2018 (China) [33]Han et al., 2019 (China) [34]Lee et al., 2009 (South Korea) [35]Li et al., 2014 (China) [36]Zhao et al., 2015 (China) [37]Chen et al., 2018 (Chin a) [38]Zhang et al., 2022 (China) [39]

Phase 1
 Assessing relevanceLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
 Patients/population(s)YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 Intervention(s)YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 Comparator(s)YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 Outcome(s)YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Phase 2-domain 1: study eligibility criteriaLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
 2.1.1PyPYPYPYPYPYPYPYPYPYPYPYYY
 2.1.2YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 2.1.3YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 2.1.4YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 2.1.5YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Phase 2-domain 2: identification and selection of studiesHHHHHHHHHHLLLL
 2.2.1PyNYNNNNNPYYPYPYPYPY
 2.2.2YNNNYNNNNYYYYY
 2.2.3PNPNPNPNPNPNPNPNPNPNPYYPYY
 2.2.4PYYYYNNYYYYYYYY
 2.2.5YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Phase 2-domain 3: collection and study appraisalHLLHHLLHLHHLLL
 2.3.1YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 2.3.2NYYNNYYNYYYYYY
 2.3.3YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 2.3.4NYYYYYYYYNNYYY
 2.3.5YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Phase 2-domain 4: synthesis and findingsHHHHHHHHHHHHLH
 2.4.1PNPNPNPNPNPNPNPNPNPNPNPYPYPY
 2.4.2NINININININININININININIYY
 2.4.3YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 2.4.4YNNNNYYNYNYYYN
 2.4.5NININNINNINNNINNNYN
 2.4.6NNNNNYNNYNYYYN
Phase 3 risk of bias in the reviewHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
 ANNNNNNNNNNNNYN
 BYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
 CNYYYNYNNNNYNNN

Note:Y: yes; PY: probably yes; PN: probably no; N: no; NI: no information; L: low risk; H: high risk.