Human Action Recognition Using Improved Salient Dense Trajectories

Table 3

Comparison to the state-of-the-art results.

KTH	UCF sports	HMDB51	UCF50
DTF + BOW [16] 94.2%	DTF + BOW [16] 88.2%	DTF + BOW [9] 46.6%	DTF + BOW [9] 84.5%
Chen et al. [12] 94%	Chen et al. [12] 88.7%	ITF + FV [29] 57.2%	ITF + FV [29] 91.2%
O’Hara and Draper [13] 97.9%	O’Hara and Draper [13] 91.3%	Stacked FV [30] 56.21%	Shi et al. [31] 83.3%
ISDT + IBOW (ours) 97.6%	ISDT + IBOW (ours) 93.4%	ISDT + IBOW (ours) 56.7%	ISDT + IBOW (ours) 90.3%