Research Article
A Two-Stream Deep Fusion Framework for High-Resolution Aerial Scene Classification
Table 6
Comparison with the state-of-the-art methods on the AID dataset.
| Methods | Training ratios | 20% | 50% |
| BoVW [42] | - | 78.66 ± 0.52 | MS-CLBP + FV [42] | - | 86.48 ± 0.27 | GoogLeNet [41] | 83.44 ± 0.40 | 86.39 ± 0.55 | CaffeNet [41] | 86.86 ± 0.47 | 89.53 ± 0.31 | VGG-VD-16 [41] | 86.59 ± 0.29 | 89.64 ± 0.36 | salM3LBP-CLM [42] | 86.92 ± 0.35 | 89.76 ± 0.45 | Fusion by addition [44] | - | 91.87 ± 0.36 | TEX-Net-LF [43] | 90.87 ± 0.11 | 92.96 ± 0.18 | Ours | 92.32 ± 0.41 | 94.58 ± 0.25 |
|
|