Research Article

Facing High EEG Signals Variability during Classification Using Fractal Dimension and Different Cutoff Frequencies

Table 9

Average accuracy for Condition A during the classification of feet and tongue movements and using the classical filter configuration (1–100).

SubjectHiguchiKatzAR

A10.55 ± 0.040.55 ± 0.040.58 ± 0.03
A20.52 ± 0.040.55 ± 0.030.54 ± 0.04
A30.64 ± 0.030.58 ± 0.040.62 ± 0.05
A40.48 ± 0.040.52 ± 0.030.50 ± 0.03
A50.53 ± 0.040.50 ± 0.020.50 ± 0.01
A60.54 ± 0.040.57 ± 0.030.54 ± 0.04
A70.54 ± 0.030.59 ± 0.060.64 ± 0.05
A80.73 ± 0.030.68 ± 0.040.62 ± 0.05
A90.68 ± 0.040.75 ± 0.060.70 ± 0.06
Average0.58 ± 0.040.59 ± 0.040.58 ± 0.04

Accuracies that are significantly different compared with the best result. Values in bold indicate the best average accuracy achieved from the different feature extraction techniques.