Review Article
Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm: A Survey and Performance Evaluation
Table 4
Ranking of CSO algorithm compared to the modern metaheuristic algorithms.
| | Test functions | Ranking of CSO | Ranking of DA | Ranking of BOA | Ranking of FDO |
| | F1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | | F2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | F3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | F4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | F5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | | F6 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | F7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | | F8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | F9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | F10 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | F11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | F12 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | | F13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | | F14 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | F15 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | F16 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | | F17 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | F18 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | | F19 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | F20 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | | F21 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | F22 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | | F23 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | Cec01 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | Cec02 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | Cec03 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Cec04 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Cec05 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | | Cec06 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | | Cec07 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Cec08 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | | Cec09 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Cec10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | | Total | 70 | 97 | 91 | 72 | | Overall ranking | 2.121212 | 2.939394 | 2.757576 | 2.181818 | | F1–F7 subtotal | 15 | 27 | 11 | 17 | | F1–F7 ranking | 2.142857 | 3.857143 | 1.571429 | 2.428571 | | F8–F23 subtotal | 32 | 43 | 45 | 40 | | F8–F23 ranking | 2 | 2.6875 | 2.8125 | 2.5 | | CEC01–CEC10 subtotal | 23 | 27 | 35 | 15 | | CEC01–CEC10 ranking | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 1.5 |
|
|
