Research Article
Chinese Emergency Event Recognition Using Conv-RDBiGRU Model
Table 3
Experimental comparison results in CEC.
| Model | P (%) | R (%) | F (%) |
| SVM [37] | 79.30 | 59.90 | 63.70 | Conv-DBiGRU | 72.31 | 63.51 | 67.62 | CNN | 72.73 | 64.00 | 68.09 | GRU | 69.70 | 66.67 | 68.15 | DCFEE [28] | 68.07 | 70.85 | 69.43 | BiGRU [38] | 71.10 | 69.00 | 70.00 | Conv-BiGRU | 73.02 | 69.70 | 71.32 | Doc2EDAG [33] | 73.49 | 70.31 | 71.87 | Transfer [34] | 74.09 | 70.48 | 72.24 | CNN-BiGRU | 74.24 | 71.01 | 72.59 | Conv-RDBiGRU | 78.79 | 69.33 | 73.76 | LEAM [35] | 71.08 | 79.72 | 75.15 |
|
|