|
S. no. | Author | Year | Method/methodology | Comments |
|
1 | Liying and Lirong [13] | 2017 | Scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) | Performs retrieval on more than a single query to increase the retrieval accuracy. |
Convolutional neural network (CNN) |
|
2 | Dhotre et al. [4] | 2017 | The color feature extracted through CHRIR and wavelet transform performed using multilevel Haar wavelet transform (MHWT) | Proved to be a faster retrieval method on an image database with one of the physical features. Works more accurately with increased retrieval speed and minimized time. |
|
3 | Jayanthi and Karthikeyan [2] | 2015 | FCTH, CEDD, HWT, and DWT using fuzzy linking and Gabor filters | Database with 1000 color images results in better recall and average precision of retrieval. |
|
4 | Thepade and Shinde [3] | 2015 | Haar wavelet transforms with Canny edge detection based on shape features using gradient techniques such as Prewitt, Laplace, and Sobel, and the slope magnitude technique with the Manhattan similarity function | Database with 350 color images |
Frei-Chen and Sobel give better performance than the other algorithms that used Canny implementation. |
|
5 | Jayanthi and Karthikeyan [2] | 2015 | HWT and DWT using Gabor filters and fuzzy linking | Gives good results in average precision and recall value. |
|
6 | Gupta and Kushwah [8] | 2015 | Haar discrete wavelet transform (H-DWT), gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) | Improved results in comparison with previous methods. |
Support vector machine (SVM) |
|
7 | Agarwal et al. [5] | 2014 | Used color edge detection and DWT | Database used was Wang’s image database. Gave high precision and recall values. |
|
8 | Agarwal et al. [5] | 2014 | Color edge detection, DWT | High precision and recall indicate an exemplary retrieval system |
Canny edge detection |
|
9 | Ying Chen and Wu [6] | 2011 | Uses optical flow to extract the information from the video; extraction process with Haar wavelet | Locates the feature almost near the query point using index values. |
|
10 | Chatzichristofis et al. [7] | 2010 | The method based on color and edge directivity descriptor (CEDD) | Demonstrated successful retrieval on benchmark datasets. |
Utilizes the binary Haar wavelet transform for extraction |
|
11 | Quellec et al. [12] | 2010 | The multidimensional wavelet filter bank | Can be used in a different dimension of signal and different lattices. |
|
12 | Verma et al. [1] | 2009 | Texture analysis-based scheme | Own dataset with 100 color images of size 256 × 256 pixels each. Accuracy up to 73%. |
I level Haar wavelet used for image decomposition F-norm theory to decrease the dimension of the extracted feature; fuzzy logic similarity measure used |
|
13 | Huang et al. [10] | 2005 | Lifting scheme F-norm theory | Good at retrieval. |
|
14 | Wong et al. [9] | 2005 | AdaBoost-based face defection method and the lifting wavelet transform (LFWT) technique | Efficient with small memory to detect the face. Suits best for multimedia applications |
|
15 | Munjal and Bhatia [17] | 2019 | UCID dataset used, CEDD and Gabor wavelet transform (GWT) for feature vector | Accuracy = 91.9%. |
|
16 | Varish et al. [18] | 2020 | Fusion of histograms of gradients and invariant moments, Corel 1K and GHIM-10K dataset used for validation | Precision = 89% and 90%. |
Recall = 17.80% and 3.60. |
F-score = 29.49% and 6.92%. |
|
17 | Wadhera and Agarwal [19] | 2020 | 3D center symmetric LBP + Gaussian filter + gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), STex texture, and ESSEX face database | Precision = 61% and 97.4%. |
Retrieval rate = 97.4%. |
|
18 | Ajam et al. [20] | 2019 | LBP + HSV + entropy, Corel 10K and Corel 5K databases used | Retrieval rate = 59.51% and 49.13%. |
|
19 | Xiaobo et al. [21] | 2021 | Adaptive threshold + directional LBP, and Corel 1K database | Precision = 67.63%. |
|