Research Article
EEG-Based Personality Prediction Using Fast Fourier Transform and DeepLSTM Model
Table 5
Comparison of sensitivity, precision, and specificity of DeepLSTM model for various partition schemes.
| Dataset | Validation technique | Sensitivity (%) | Precision (%) | Specificity (%) | F1 score (%) | Mean ± Std | Mean ± Std | Mean ± Std | Mean ± Std |
| ASCERTAIN | 50–50 | 81.64 | ±3.08 | 80.53 | ±3.12 | 78.42 | ±2.84 | 80.56 | ±2.36 | 60–40 | 87.76 | ±3.14 | 86.82 | ±3.24 | 85.94 | ±2.68 | 86.44 | ±2.44 | 70–30 | 91.49 | ±3.16 | 90.56 | ±3.42 | 89.67 | ±2.36 | 90.40 | ±3.42 | 10-fold | 94.72 | ± 3.16 | 93.48 | ± 3.12 | 92.86 | ± 2.98 | 93.68 | ± 2.84 |
| Proposed dataset | 50–50 | 83.46 | ±3.14 | 82.75 | ±3.15 | 81.14 | ±3.24 | 82.46 | ±3.18 | 60–40 | 90.74 | ±3.24 | 89.25 | ±3.16 | 88.94 | ±3.18 | 89.46 | ±3.32 | 70–30 | 93.54 | ±3.14 | 92.85 | ±3.25 | 91.94 | ±3.42 | 92.28 | ±3.24 | 10-fold | 95.86 | ± 3.18 | 94.44 | ± 3.14 | 93.84 | ± 3.12 | 94.96 | ± 3.16 |
|
|
Optimal values are represented in bold.
|