Research Article
Hybrid Deep-Learning and Machine-Learning Models for Predicting COVID-19
Table 1
Literature review summary.
| Author | Data set size | Image type | Disease type | ML | CNN model | TL models | Date | Max. accuracy |
| Minaee et al. [21] | 5000 | X-ray and CT | COVID-19 | No | No | ResNet50, ResNet18, DenseNet-121, and SqueezeNet | 2020 | 98% | Jain et al. [22] | 6432 | X-ray and CT | COVID-19 | No | No | Xception | 2020 | 97.97% | Hussain et al. [23] | 558 | X-ray | COVID-19 and viral pneumonia | Yes | No | No | 2020 | 97.56% | Sekeroglu et al. [6] | 6200 | X-ray | COVID-19 and viral pneumonia | Yes | Yes | VGG19, MobileNet, inception, Xception, and inception ResNet | 2020 | 99.18% | Linda Wang et al. [24] | 13,975 | X-ray | COVID-19 and viral pneumonia | No | Yes | VGG-19 and ResNet-50 | 2020 | 98.9% | Dingding Wang et al. [25] | 1102 | X-ray | COVID-19 | Yes | No | VGG-16, Xception, ResNet50, and DenseNet121 | 2020 | 99.38% | Rahimzadeh et al. [26] | 11302 | X-ray | COVID-19 and viral pneumonia | No | No | Xception and ResNet50V2 | 2020 | 99.50% | Rahul et al. [27] | 5840 | X-ray | COVID-19 and viral pneumonia | Yes | No | ResNet152 | 2020 | 97.7% | Our work | 4646 | X-ray | COVID-19 and viral pneumonia | Yes | Yes | VGG16, VGG19, ReNet50, and MobileNet | 2021 | 99.82 |
|
|