Research Article
A Novel Feature Selection with Hybrid Deep Learning Based Heart Disease Detection and Classification in the e-Healthcare Environment
Table 2
Result analysis of the FSHDL-HDDC technique with different measures.
| No. Of iterations | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | Accuracy | F-score | MCC |
| Iteration-1 | 98.17 | 97.12 | 97.58 | 97.69 | 97.87 | 95.35 | Iteration-2 | 98.17 | 99.28 | 99.38 | 98.68 | 98.77 | 97.35 | Iteration-3 | 97.56 | 96.40 | 96.97 | 97.03 | 97.26 | 94.02 | Iteration-4 | 98.17 | 95.68 | 96.41 | 97.03 | 97.28 | 94.03 | Iteration-5 | 96.95 | 98.58 | 98.76 | 97.70 | 97.85 | 95.41 | Iteration-6 | 100.00 | 97.12 | 97.62 | 98.68 | 98.80 | 97.37 | Iteration-7 | 98.17 | 96.40 | 96.99 | 97.36 | 97.58 | 94.69 | Iteration-8 | 100.00 | 96.40 | 97.04 | 98.35 | 98.50 | 96.72 | Iteration-9 | 98.17 | 97.84 | 98.17 | 98.02 | 98.17 | 96.01 | Iteration-10 | 96.95 | 96.40 | 96.95 | 96.70 | 96.95 | 93.35 | Average | 98.23 | 97.12 | 97.59 | 97.72 | 97.90 | 95.43 |
|
|