Research Article
Biomedical Diagnosis of Leukemia Using a Deep Learner Classifier
Table 3
Comparison of three-performance metrics.
| Developed method | Method to extract features | Classifier name | Accuracy | Precision | Recall (%) |
| Mondal et al., 2021 [1] | CNN | CNN | 86.2% | 88.7% | 88.8 | Oliveira and Dantas, 2021 [2] | CNN | CNN | 91.49% | 89.61% | 93.90 | Shaheen et al., 2021 [3] | CNN | AlexNet | 98.58% | 87.4% | 88.9 | Sashank et al., 2021 [6] | CNN | SVM, KNN, decision trees | 95.05% | 95.25 | 96.75 | Claro et al., 2020 [7] | CNN | CNN | 97.18% | 97.23% | 97.18 | Dasariraji et al., 2020 [9] | Random forest | Random forest | 92.99% | 91.23% | 95.41 | Loey et al., 2020 [11] | CNN | FC | 99.04 | 99.64% | 98.44 | The proposed method | CNN (AlexNet) + SVM | SVM | 99.30% | 99.45% | 99 |
|
|